These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Do young children reverse ambiguous figures? Rock I; Gopnik A; Hall S Perception; 1994; 23(6):635-44. PubMed ID: 7845757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Creativity and ease of ambiguous figural reversal. Wiseman R; Watt C; Gilhooly K; Georgiou G Br J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 102(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 21752010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Figure reversals and creativity: a research note. Simpson MT; Lansky LM; Senter RJ; Peterson JM Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):582. PubMed ID: 6634342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Similar processing of real- and subjective-contour Poggendorff figures by men and women. Beckett PA Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Feb; 70(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2326138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Self-perceived creativity and vividness of mental imagery. Campos A; González MA Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Dec; 77(3 Pt 2):1291-6. PubMed ID: 8170783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous? Long GM; Olszweski AD Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):41-71. PubMed ID: 10696278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual ambiguity and stability of reversible figures. Riani M; Tuccio MT; Borsellino A; Radilová J; Radil T Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Aug; 63(1):191-205. PubMed ID: 3748731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Illusion reversal rate as a function of subjective depth. Borresen CR J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jan; 117(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 2313278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual differences in ambiguous-figure perception: degree of handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Christman SD; Sontam V; Jasper JD Perception; 2009; 38(8):1183-98. PubMed ID: 19817151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The boldface illusion: a new visual assimilation. Fujimoto K Perception; 2013; 42(3):358-61. PubMed ID: 23837212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Foster RM; Franz VH Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Necker cube--an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing. Kornmeier J; Bach M Vision Res; 2005 Apr; 45(8):955-60. PubMed ID: 15695180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual illusions in brief visual presentations. de Gardelle V; Sackur J; Kouider S Conscious Cogn; 2009 Sep; 18(3):569-77. PubMed ID: 19369096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What an image depicts depends on what an image means. Chambers D; Reisberg D Cogn Psychol; 1992 Apr; 24(2):145-74. PubMed ID: 1582171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mental images can be ambiguous: reconstruals and reference-frame reversals. Peterson MA; Kihlstrom JF; Rose PM; Glisky ML Mem Cognit; 1992 Mar; 20(2):107-23. PubMed ID: 1565009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlations among ambiguous figures, curiosity, and spatial ability. Beer J Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 2):1188-90. PubMed ID: 2087372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]