These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23469925)

  • 1. Detecting drawdowns masked by environmental stresses with water-level models.
    Garcia CA; Halford KJ; Fenelon JM
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(3):322-32. PubMed ID: 23469925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing Groundwater Pumping Cost Using Alternate Pulsed Pumping.
    Nagkoulis N
    Ground Water; 2021 May; 59(3):410-416. PubMed ID: 33283271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unusual and large drawdown response of buried-valley aquifers to pumping.
    van der Kamp G; Maathuis H
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 21671937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of Groundwater Level Fluctuations near an Operating Water Supply Well to Estimate Aquifer Transmissivity.
    Pozdniakov S; Ivanov P; Davis P; Sizov N
    Ground Water; 2021 Jan; 59(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 32588432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of pumping induced flow in observation wells during aquifer testing.
    Székely F
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 23198759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multidepth pumping tests in deep aquifers.
    Alam N; Olsthoorn TN
    Ground Water; 2014 Sep; 52 Suppl 1():148-60. PubMed ID: 24428328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Groundwater modeling of Saq Aquifer Buraydah Al Qassim for better water management strategies.
    Al-Salamah IS; Ghazaw YM; Ghumman AR
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Feb; 173(1-4):851-60. PubMed ID: 20364311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impacts of Groundwater Pumping for Hydraulic Fracturing on Aquifers Overlying the Eagle Ford Shale.
    Brien JA; Obkirchner GE; Knappett PSK; Miller GR; Burnett D; Bhatia M
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(3):343-356. PubMed ID: 37507835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flow depletion in a small stream caused by ground water abstraction from wells.
    Nyholm T; Christense S; Rasmussen KR
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(4):425-37. PubMed ID: 12113361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flowing Well-Time-Domain Solution and Inverse Problem Revisited.
    Perina T
    Ground Water; 2021 May; 59(3):438-442. PubMed ID: 33314058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of Pumping Tests in Heterogeneous Aquifers with Constant Head Boundary.
    Pechstein A; Copty NK
    Ground Water; 2021 Jul; 59(4):517-523. PubMed ID: 33389747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated Estimation of Aquifer Parameters from Arbitrary-Rate Pumping Tests in Python and MATLAB.
    Benson DA
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 37392403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the Factors Impacting Pesticide Concentrations in Groundwater Wells.
    Aisopou A; Binning PJ; Albrechtsen HJ; Bjerg PL
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(5):722-36. PubMed ID: 25243476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating hydraulic properties using a moving-model approach and multiple aquifer tests.
    Halford KJ; Yobbi D
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):284-91. PubMed ID: 16556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to Find Aquifer Statistics Utilizing Pumping Tests? Two Field Studies Using welltestpy.
    Müller S; Leven C; Dietrich P; Attinger S; Zech A
    Ground Water; 2022 Jan; 60(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 34231221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Simplified Solution Using Izbash's Equation for Non-Darcian Flow in a Constant Rate Pumping Test.
    Xiao L; Ye M; Xu Y; Gan F
    Ground Water; 2019 Nov; 57(6):962-968. PubMed ID: 30937895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kriging water levels with a regional-linear and point-logarithmic drift.
    Tonkin MJ; Larson SP
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 11916123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytical model for aquifer response incorporating distributed stream leakage.
    Fox GA; DuChateau P; Durnford DS
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(4):378-84. PubMed ID: 12113356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Approximation of Inner Boundary Conditions for Wells Intersecting Highly Conductive Structures.
    Giese M; Reimann T; Liedl R; Dewandel B; Maréchal JC; Sauter M
    Ground Water; 2020 Jul; 58(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 31576553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pumping test in a confined aquifer under tidal influence.
    Chapuis RP; Bélanger C; Chenaf D
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 16556212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.