165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23471598)
21. Symptomatic fibroleiomyomata: MR imaging of the uterus before and after uterine arterial embolization.
Jha RC; Ascher SM; Imaoka I; Spies JB
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):228-35. PubMed ID: 11012449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary failure of uterine artery embolization: use of magnetic resonance imaging to select patients for repeated embolization.
Chrisman HB; West D; Corpuz B; Ryu RK; Salem R; Carr J; Vogelzang R; Omary RA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 Aug; 16(8):1143-7. PubMed ID: 16105928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Apparent diffusion coefficient of uterine leiomyoma as a predictor of the potential response to uterine artery embolization.
Lee MS; Kim MD; Jung DC; Lee M; Won JY; Park SI; Lee DY; Lee KH
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1361-5. PubMed ID: 23891046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Susceptibility weighted MRI after uterine artery embolization for leiomyoma.
Yamahana Y; Katsumori T; Miura H; Asai S; Yamada S; Takahata A; Yamada K
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 58():32-37. PubMed ID: 30654161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Development of a Model for the Prediction of Treatment Response of Uterine Leiomyomas after Uterine Artery Embolization.
Chung YJ; Kang SY; Chun HJ; Rha SE; Cho HH; Kim JH; Kim MR
Int J Med Sci; 2018; 15(14):1771-1777. PubMed ID: 30588202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: percentage of infarction predicts clinical outcome.
Kroencke TJ; Scheurig C; Poellinger A; Gronewold M; Hamm B
Radiology; 2010 Jun; 255(3):834-41. PubMed ID: 20392986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcomes after uterine artery embolization for pedunculated subserosal leiomyomas.
Margau R; Simons ME; Rajan DK; Hayeems EB; Sniderman KW; Tan K; Beecroft JR; Kachura JR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 May; 19(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 18440452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of four embolic materials at uterine artery embolization by using postprocedural MR imaging enhancement.
Abramowitz SD; Israel GM; McCarthy SM; Pollak JS; White RI; Tal MG
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 19188316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Spectrum of imaging findings on MRI and CT after uterine artery embolization.
Verma SK; Gonsalves CF; Baltarowich OH; Mitchell DG; Lev-Toaff AS; Bergin D
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19048334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of uterine and ovarian arteries before uterine artery embolization: advantages conferred by unenhanced MR angiography.
Mori K; Saida T; Shibuya Y; Takahashi N; Shiigai M; Osada K; Tanaka N; Minami M
Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):467-75. PubMed ID: 20332375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Treatment of uterine fibromyoma with bilateral uterine artery embolization: state of the art].
Lupattelli T; Clerissi J; Basile A; Minnella DP; Donati Sarti R; Gerli S; Di Renzo G
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):427-39. PubMed ID: 17923833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MRI assessment of uterine artery patency and fibroid infarction rates 6 months after uterine artery embolization with nonspherical polyvinyl alcohol.
Das R; Gonsalves M; Vlahos I; Manyonda I; Belli AM
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2013 Oct; 36(5):1280-7. PubMed ID: 23385663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of clinical and MR imaging outcomes after uterine fibroid embolization with Bead Block and Embosphere.
Liaw JV; Yun CH; Walker TG; Kalva SP; Janne d'Othée B
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 81(6):1371-5. PubMed ID: 21439744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fibroid infected with Escherichia coli requiring surgical removal following uterine artery embolization.
Sterling L; Boutet M; Colak E; Lefebvre G
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Sep; 35(9):823-826. PubMed ID: 24099448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of uterine fibroids treated with uterine artery embolization.
Katsumori T; Nakajima K; Tokuhiro M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 11461850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. First Versus Second Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Leiomyoma.
Katsumori T; Miura H; Asai S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):684-689. PubMed ID: 28639830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Submucosal fibroids becoming endocavitary following uterine artery embolization: risk assessment by MRI.
Verma SK; Bergin D; Gonsalves CF; Mitchell DG; Lev-Toaff AS; Parker L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1220-6. PubMed ID: 18430835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Literature review of outcomes and prevalence and case report of leiomyosarcomas and non-typical uterine smooth muscle leiomyoma tumors treated with uterine artery embolization.
Kainsbak J; Hansen ES; Dueholm M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():130-7. PubMed ID: 26117442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predicting the Fibroid-Migratory Impact of UAE: Role of Pre-embolization MRI Characteristics.
Mailli L; Auyoung EY; Angileri SA; Ameli-Renani S; Ratnam L; Das R; Chun JY; Das S; Manyonda I; Belli AM
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2020 Mar; 43(3):453-458. PubMed ID: 31650245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of uterine peristalsis before and after uterine artery embolization at 3-T MRI.
Kido A; Ascher SM; Kishimoto K; Hahn W; Jha RC; Togashi K; Spies JB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1431-5. PubMed ID: 21606309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
