These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2347175)

  • 21. Majantol.
    Herro E; Jacob SE
    Dermatitis; 2011; 22(2):112-3. PubMed ID: 21504697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Is it really fragrance-free?
    Scheinman PL
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Dec; 8(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 9358119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multicentre study of fragrance allergy in Hungary. Immediate and late type reactions.
    Temesvári E; Németh I; Baló-Banga MJ; Husz S; Kohánka V; Somos Z; Judák R; Remenyik EV; Szegedi A; Nebenführer L; Mészáros C; Horváth A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jun; 46(6):325-30. PubMed ID: 12190620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy.
    Mann J; McFadden JP; White JM; White IR; Banerjee P
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 24731084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review.
    de Groot AC; Frosch PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Feb; 36(2):57-86. PubMed ID: 9062742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Increase in contact allergy to fragrances: patch-test results 1989-1998.
    Lunder T; Kansky A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 10945750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitization to fragrances in Spain: A 5-year multicentre study (2011-2015).
    Silvestre JF; Mercader P; González-Pérez R; Hervella-Garcés M; Sanz-Sánchez T; Córdoba S; Sánchez-Pérez J; Heras-Mendoza F; Giménez-Arnau AM; Gatica-Ortega ME; Pastor-NIeto MA; Zaragoza V; Carrascosa JM; García-Bravo B; Ruiz-González I; Borrego L; Sánchez-Pedreño P; de Frutos JO; Armario-Hita JC; García-Gavín J; Fernández-Redondo V
    Contact Dermatitis; 2019 Feb; 80(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 30430587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Simultaneous patch testing with fragrance mix I, fragrance mix II and their ingredients in southern Sweden between 2009 and 2015.
    Mowitz M; Svedman C; Zimerson E; Isaksson M; Pontén A; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):280-287. PubMed ID: 28685882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Association between positive patch tests to epoxy resin and fragrance mix I ingredients.
    Andersen KE; Christensen LP; Vølund A; Johansen JD; Paulsen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 19260913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
    Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Frequency of false-negative reactions to the fragrance mix.
    de Groot AC; van der Kley AM; Bruynzeel DP; Meinardi MM; Smeenk G; van Joost T; Pavel S
    Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Mar; 28(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 8462288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patch test concentrations (doses in mg/cm2 ) for the 12 non-mix fragrance substances regulated by European legislation.
    Bruze M; Svedman C; Andersen KE; Bruynzeel D; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Matura M; Orton D; Vigan M;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Mar; 66(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 22320667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.
    Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Non-mix fragrances are top sensitizers in consecutive dermatitis patients - a cross-sectional study of the 26 EU-labelled fragrance allergens.
    Bennike NH; Zachariae C; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Nov; 77(5):270-279. PubMed ID: 28511284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I).
    Larsen W; Nakayama H; Lindberg M; Fischer T; Elsner P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott J
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 8796746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Identification of Lilial as a fragrance sensitizer in a perfume by bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and structure-activity relationships.
    Arnau EG; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Johansen JD; Menné T; Rastogi SC; White IR; Lepoittevin JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Dec; 43(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 11140386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quantitative analysis of fragrance allergens in various matrixes of cosmetics by liquid-liquid extraction and GC-MS.
    Lu CH; Fang MC; Chen YZ; Huang SC; Wang DY
    J Food Drug Anal; 2021 Dec; 29(4):700-708. PubMed ID: 35649135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A review of 241 subjects who were patch tested twice: could fragrance mix I cause active sensitization?
    White JM; McFadden JP; White IR
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Mar; 158(3):518-21. PubMed ID: 18205877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Natural ingredients based cosmetics. Content of selected fragrance sensitizers.
    Rastogi SC; Johansen JD; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Jun; 34(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 8879930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patch testing with markers of fragrance contact allergy. Do clinical tests correspond to patients' self-reported problems?
    Johansen JD; Andersen TF; Veien N; Avnstorp C; Andersen KE; Menné T
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1997 Mar; 77(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 9111830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.