These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2347175)

  • 41. Contact allergy to popular perfumes; assessed by patch test, use test and chemical analysis.
    Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Menné T
    Br J Dermatol; 1996 Sep; 135(3):419-22. PubMed ID: 8949436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Immediate and delayed reactions to cosmetic ingredients.
    Emmons WW; Marks JG
    Contact Dermatitis; 1985 Oct; 13(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 4085225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Patch test results with fragrance markers of the baseline series - analysis of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA) network 2009-2012.
    Frosch PJ; Duus Johansen J; Schuttelaar ML; Silvestre JF; Sánchez-Pérez J; Weisshaar E; Uter W;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2015 Sep; 73(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 26080686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
    Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix detects additional patients sensitive to perfumes and missed by the current fragrance mix.
    Frosch PJ; Pirker C; Rastogi SC; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):207-15. PubMed ID: 15859993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Patch testing with a new fragrance mix - reactivity to the individual constituents and chemical detection in relevant cosmetic products.
    Frosch PJ; Rastogi SC; Pirker C; Brinkmeier T; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Svedman C; Goossens A; White IR; Uter W; Arnau EG; Lepoittevin JP; Johansen JD; Menne T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 15859994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fragrance mix reactions and lime allergic contact dermatitis.
    Swerdlin A; Rainey D; Storrs FJ
    Dermatitis; 2010; 21(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 20646673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A clinical and patch test study of contact dermatitis from traditional Chinese medicinal materials.
    Li LF
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Dec; 33(6):392-5. PubMed ID: 8706396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK*.
    Schnuch A; Lessmann H; Geier J; Frosch PJ; Uter W;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Feb; 50(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 15128316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Exposure to selected fragrance materials. A case study of fragrance-mix-positive eczema patients.
    Johansen JD; Rastogi SC; Menné T
    Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Feb; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 8681536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Contact reactions to fragrances.
    Katsarou A; Armenaka M; Kalogeromitros D; Koufou V; Georgala S
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1999 May; 82(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 10353576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Positive Patch-Test Reactions to Essential Oils in Consecutive Patients From North America and Central Europe.
    Warshaw EM; Zug KA; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; DeKoven JG; Sasseville D; Maibach HI; Mathias CGT; DeLeo VA; Taylor JS; Fransway AF; Marks JG; Pratt MD; Zirwas MJ; Geier J; Uter W
    Dermatitis; 2017; 28(4):246-252. PubMed ID: 28614106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cinnamic aldehyde: a survey of consumer patch-test sensitization.
    Danneman PJ; Booman KA; Dorsky J; Kohrman KA; Rothenstein AS; Sedlak RI; Steltenkamp RJ; Thompson GR
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1983 Dec; 21(6):721-5. PubMed ID: 6686575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Reactions to fragrances and textiles].
    Hausen BM
    Z Hautkr; 1987 Dec; 62(23):1649-52, 1655-6. PubMed ID: 3326311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Patch testing with perfume mixture.
    Veien NK; Hattel T; Justesen O; Nørholm A
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1982; 62(4):341-3. PubMed ID: 6183871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Patch testing with the European baseline series fragrance markers: a 2016 update.
    Ung CY; White JML; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
    Br J Dermatol; 2018 Mar; 178(3):776-780. PubMed ID: 28960261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Identification of risk products for fragrance contact allergy: a case-referent study based on patients' histories.
    Johansen JD; Andersen TF; Kjøller M; Veien N; Avnstorp C; Andersen KE; Menné T
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 9601907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
    Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sensitization to contact allergens and bronchial hyper-responsiveness.
    Schnabel E; Schoefer Y; Chen CM; Schäfer T; Behrendt H; Ring J; Wichmann HE; Heinrich J;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 20690939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Patch testing in patients with suspected cosmetic dermatitis: A retrospective study.
    Garg T; Agarwal S; Chander R; Singh A; Yadav P
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2018 Feb; 17(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 28568892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.