These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23472813)
1. Institutional conscience and access to services: can we have both? Flynn C; Wilson RF Virtual Mentor; 2013 Mar; 15(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 23472813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Religious employers and exceptions to mandated coverage of contraceptives. Flicker LS Virtual Mentor; 2013 Mar; 15(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 23472812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Contraceptive Coverage and the Balance Between Conscience and Access. Stahl RY; Lynch HF JAMA; 2017 Dec; 318(22):2179-2180. PubMed ID: 29049513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The ACA decision: law and philosophy. Kaebnick GE Hastings Cent Rep; 2012; 42(5):2. PubMed ID: 22976400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Access to health insurance. Issue brief. Health Policy Tracking Service, A Service of Thomson Reuters/West Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2011 Jan; ():1-65. PubMed ID: 21370539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Group health plans and health insurance issuers relating to coverage of preventive services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Final rules. ; ; Fed Regist; 2012 Feb; 77(31):8725-30. PubMed ID: 22379684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception. Charo RA JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1537-8. PubMed ID: 25024087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Proposed regulations could limit access to affordable health coverage for workers' children and family members. Jacobs K; Graham-Squire D; Roby DH; Kominski GF; Kinane CM; Needleman J; Watson G; Gans D Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res; 2011 Dec; ():1-11. PubMed ID: 23599987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coverage of certain preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. Final rules. ; ; Fed Regist; 2013 Jul; 78(127):39869-99. PubMed ID: 23833808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hobby Lobby, corporate law, and the theory of the firm: why for-profit corporations are RFRA persons. Meese AJ; Oman NB Harv Law Rev; 2014 May; 127(7):273-301. PubMed ID: 25330559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Drafting a "sensible" conscience clause: a proposal for meaningful conscience protections for religious employers objecting to the mandated coverage of prescription contraceptives. Rudary DJ Health Matrix Clevel; 2013; 23(1):353-94. PubMed ID: 23808105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Brendan F. Brown Lecture series constitutional challenges: religious liberty and the HHS mandate. Rienzi ML J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2012; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 23424899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Contraceptives and the law: a view from a Catholic medical institution. Zimmer EA; Welie JV; Rendell MS JAMA; 2013 May; 309(19):1999-2000. PubMed ID: 23677311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Access to Rehabilitative Care in the Affordable Care Act Era. Ullmann SG AMA J Ethics; 2015 Jun; 17(6):553-7. PubMed ID: 26075983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Point/counterpoint: what can Massachusetts teach us about national health insurance reform? Joyce TJ; Holtz-Eakin D; Gruber J J Policy Anal Manage; 2010; 30(1):177-95. PubMed ID: 21465826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]