These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

860 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23472996)

  • 1. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Polanía E; Bujanda L; Lanas A; Hermo JA; Cubiella J; Ono A; González-Méndez Y; Peris A; Pellisé M; Seoane A; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Ponce M; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Fernández-Díez S; Arenas J; Sopeña F; de-Castro L; Vega-Villaamil P; Rodríguez-Soler M; Carballo F; Salas D; Morillas JD; Andreu M; Quintero E; Castells A;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Mar; 77(3):381-389.e1. PubMed ID: 23218945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
    Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
    Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Different bowel preparation schedule leads to different diagnostic yield of proximal and nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasm at screening colonoscopy in average-risk population.
    Chiu HM; Lin JT; Lee YC; Liang JT; Shun CT; Wang HP; Wu MS
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Dec; 54(12):1570-7. PubMed ID: 22067187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
    Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Defining adenoma detection rate benchmarks in average-risk male veterans.
    El-Halabi MM; Rex DK; Saito A; Eckert GJ; Kahi CJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Jan; 89(1):137-143. PubMed ID: 30144416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advanced adenoma detection rate is independent of nonadvanced adenoma detection rate.
    Greenspan M; Rajan KB; Baig A; Beck T; Mobarhan S; Melson J
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Aug; 108(8):1286-92. PubMed ID: 23711625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates.
    Sherer EA; Imler TD; Imperiale TF
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):545-53. PubMed ID: 22138085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased adenoma detection rate with system-wide implementation of a split-dose preparation for colonoscopy.
    Gurudu SR; Ramirez FC; Harrison ME; Leighton JA; Crowell MD
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Sep; 76(3):603-8.e1. PubMed ID: 22732876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomic and advanced adenoma detection rates as quality metrics determined via natural language processing.
    Gawron AJ; Thompson WK; Keswani RN; Rasmussen LV; Kho AN
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 109(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 24935271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
    Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy in the Peruvian Japanese Policlinic: linked factors].
    Pérez VP; Yamamoto JW; Nago AN; Benavides MA; Ulloa CR; Alvarez GV; Calixto NN; Yoshidaira MY; Sánchez TG; Sánchez JP
    Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2011 Dec; 41(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 22292224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
    Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice.
    de Jonge V; Sint Nicolaas J; Cahen DL; Moolenaar W; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; van Tilburg AJ; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 21907986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).
    Lee RH; Tang RS; Muthusamy VR; Ho SB; Shah NK; Wetzel L; Bain AS; Mackintosh EE; Paek AM; Crissien AM; Saraf LJ; Kalmaz DM; Savides TJ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jul; 74(1):128-34. PubMed ID: 21531410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
    Sanaka MR; Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel TD; Podugu A; Thota PN; Lopez R; Kiran RP; Burke CA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jan; 83(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 26024584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy.
    Imperiale TF; Glowinski EA; Juliar BE; Azzouz F; Ransohoff DF
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Jun; 69(7):1288-95. PubMed ID: 19481649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differences in proximal serrated polyp detection among endoscopists are associated with variability in withdrawal time.
    de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; Bossuyt PM; Tytgat KM; Dees J; Mathus-Vliegen EM; Kuipers EJ; Fockens P; van Leerdam ME; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 23321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.