These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23473330)

  • 1. Effectiveness of targeted surveillance to identify moderate to profound permanent childhood hearing impairment in babies with risk factors who pass newborn screening.
    Wood SA; Davis AC; Sutton GJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 23473330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of hypoxia, premature birth, infection, ototoxic drugs, circulatory system and congenital disease on neonatal hearing loss.
    Yoshikawa S; Ikeda K; Kudo T; Kobayashi T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2004 Dec; 31(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 15571908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai.
    Xu ZM; Cheng WX; Yang XL
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol.
    Johnson JL; White KR; Widen JE; Gravel JS; James M; Kennalley T; Maxon AB; Spivak L; Sullivan-Mahoney M; Vohr BR; Weirather Y; Holstrum J
    Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Wessex Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Trial Group.
    Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352(9145):1957-64. PubMed ID: 9872244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of changes in click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) pass criteria, as used in the English newborn hearing screening program, on screening outcome.
    Stevens J; Brandreth M; Bacon P
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):613-7. PubMed ID: 24825366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcome of Newborn Hearing Screening Programme delivered by health visitors.
    Basu S; Evans KL; Owen M; Harbottle T
    Child Care Health Dev; 2008 Sep; 34(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 18796055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the clinical effectiveness of different new-born hearing screening strategies. A decision analysis.
    Grill E; Hessel F; Siebert U; Schnell-Inderst P; Kunze S; Nickisch A; Wasem J
    BMC Public Health; 2005 Jan; 5():12. PubMed ID: 15679901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Targeted surveillance for postnatal hearing loss: a program evaluation.
    Beswick R; Driscoll C; Kei J; Glennon S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jul; 76(7):1046-56. PubMed ID: 22560230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units.
    van Straaten HL; Hille ET; Kok JH; Verkerk PH;
    Acta Paediatr; 2003; 92(3):332-8. PubMed ID: 12725549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neonatal cochlear function: measurement after exposure to acoustic noise during in utero MR imaging.
    Reeves MJ; Brandreth M; Whitby EH; Hart AR; Paley MN; Griffiths PD; Stevens JC
    Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):802-9. PubMed ID: 20876389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing screening in a well-infant nursery: profile of automated ABR-fail/OAE-pass.
    Berg AL; Prieve BA; Serpanos YC; Wheaton MA
    Pediatrics; 2011 Feb; 127(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 21262886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neonatal hearing screening: modelling cost and effectiveness of hospital- and community-based screening.
    Grill E; Uus K; Hessel F; Davies L; Taylor RS; Wasem J; Bamford J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Feb; 6():14. PubMed ID: 16504089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of population-based newborn hearing screening in England: ages of interventions and profile of cases.
    Uus K; Bamford J
    Pediatrics; 2006 May; 117(5):e887-93. PubMed ID: 16651292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of the Austrian Newborn Hearing Screening Program].
    Weichbold V; Nekahm-Heis D; Welzl-Müller K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2005 Sep; 117(18):641-6. PubMed ID: 16416347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Newborn hearing screening: a regional example for national care.
    Adelola OA; Papanikolaou V; Gormley P; Lang J; Keogh IJ
    Ir Med J; 2010 May; 103(5):146-9. PubMed ID: 20666087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age at diagnosis of deaf babies: a retrospective analysis highlighting the advantage of newborn hearing screening.
    Canale A; Favero E; Lacilla M; Recchia E; Schindler A; Roggero N; Albera R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1283-9. PubMed ID: 16488484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using otoacoustic emissions to screen for hearing loss in early childhood care settings.
    Eiserman WD; Hartel DM; Shisler L; Buhrmann J; White KR; Foust T
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 72(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 18276019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance and characteristics of the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme in England: The first seven years.
    Wood SA; Sutton GJ; Davis AC
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):353-8. PubMed ID: 25766652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which risk factors predict postnatal hearing loss in children?
    Beswick R; Driscoll C; Kei J; Khan A; Glennon S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 23506665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.