202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23474352)
21. Vaginal dose de-escalation in image guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Mohamed S; Lindegaard JC; de Leeuw AA; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Kirchheiner K; Kirisits C; Pötter R; Tanderup K
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):480-485. PubMed ID: 27267048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intra-fractional dosimetric analysis of image-guided intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Yan J; Zhu J; Chen K; Yu L; Zhang F
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Aug; 16(1):144. PubMed ID: 34348758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A volumetric analysis of GTV
Jastaniyah N; Yoshida K; Tanderup K; Lindegaard JC; Sturdza A; Kirisits C; Šegedin B; Mahantshetty U; Rai B; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Haie-Meder C; Banerjee S; Pötter R;
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):404-411. PubMed ID: 27452409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Single magnetic resonance imaging vs magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Beriwal S; Kim H; Coon D; Mogus R; Heron DE; Li X; Huq MS
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Aug; 21(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 19423307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. SU-E-T-515: Comparison of Two Dose-Specification Methods for the Treatment of Uterine Cervix Cancer with HDR Brachytherapy Using a Tandem and Ring Applicator.
Bhandare N; Yeung A
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3824. PubMed ID: 28518529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of DVH parameters and loading patterns of standard loading, manual and inverse optimization for intracavitary brachytherapy on a subset of tandem/ovoid cases.
Jamema SV; Kirisits C; Mahantshetty U; Trnkova P; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava SK; Pötter R
Radiother Oncol; 2010 Dec; 97(3):501-6. PubMed ID: 20846734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
Annede P; Dumas I; Schernberg A; Tailleur A; Fumagalli I; Bockel S; Mignot F; Kissel M; Deutsch E; Haie-Meder C; Chargari C
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 30797698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical outcomes with MRI-guided image-based brachytherapy in cervical cancer: An institutional experience.
Simha V; Rai B; Patel FD; Kapoor R; Sharma SC; Singh OA; Singla V; Dhanireddy B; Ghoshal S
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(2):345-351. PubMed ID: 29102740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. New inverse planning technology for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy: description and evaluation within a clinical frame.
Trnková P; Pötter R; Baltas D; Karabis A; Fidarova E; Dimopoulos J; Georg D; Kirisits C
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):331-40. PubMed ID: 19846230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A feasibility study of using advanced external beam techniques to create a vaginal cuff brachytherapy-like endometrial boost plan.
Grelewicz Z; Zerrusen B; Sathiaseelan V; Zhang H
Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 28886961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional planning techniques using an intravaginal multichannel balloon applicator for high-dose-rate gynecologic brachytherapy.
Park SJ; Chung M; Demanes DJ; Banerjee R; Steinberg M; Kamrava M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 24138921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ureter dose optimization during image guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Sarwar A; Lalli N; Eminowicz G
Brachytherapy; 2022; 21(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 35422401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Adaptive brachytherapy of cervical cancer, comparison of conventional point A and CT based individual treatment planning.
Wanderås AD; Sundset M; Langdal I; Danielsen S; Frykholm G; Marthinsen AB
Acta Oncol; 2012 Mar; 51(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22035118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 45 or 50 Gy, Which is the Optimal Radiotherapy Pelvic Dose in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Perspective of Reaching Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Adaptive Brachytherapy Planning Aims?
Mazeron R; Petit C; Rivin E; Limkin E; Dumas I; Maroun P; Annede P; Martinetti F; Seisen T; Lefkopoulos D; Chargari C; Haie-Meder C
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 26547694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dose-volume histogram parameters of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for Stage I-II cervical cancer (≤4cm) arising from a small-sized uterus treated with a point A dose-reduced plan.
Nakagawa A; Ohno T; Noda SE; Kubo N; Kuwako K; Saitoh J; Nakano T
J Radiat Res; 2014 Jul; 55(4):788-93. PubMed ID: 24566721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Isodose surface volumes in cervix cancer brachytherapy: Change of practice from standard (Point A) to individualized image guided adaptive (EMBRACE I) brachytherapy.
Serban M; Kirisits C; Pötter R; de Leeuw A; Nkiwane K; Dumas I; Nesvacil N; Swamidas J; Hudej R; Lowe G; Hellebust TP; Menon G; Oinam A; Bownes P; Oosterveld B; De Brabandere M; Koedooder K; Marthinsen ABL; Lindegaard J; Tanderup K;
Radiother Oncol; 2018 Dec; 129(3):567-574. PubMed ID: 30243671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feasibility study of toxicity outcomes using GEC-ESTRO contouring guidelines on CT based instead of MRI-based planning in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.
Koh V; Choo BA; Lee KM; Tan TH; Low JH; Ng SY; Ilancheran A; Shen L; Tang J
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(1):126-132. PubMed ID: 27816539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study.
Serban M; Kirisits C; de Leeuw A; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Nesvacil N; Swamidas J; Hudej R; Lowe G; Hellebust TP; Menon G; Oinam A; Bownes P; Oosterveld B; De Brabandere M; Koedooder K; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Whitney D; Lindegaard J; Tanderup K;
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Apr; 106(5):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 32007365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of computed tomography with magnetic resonance imaging for imaging-based clinical target volume contours in cervical cancer brachytherapy.
Zolciak-Siwinska A; Kowalczyk A; Sikorska K; Bijok M; Michalski W; Gruszczynska E
Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(4):667-672. PubMed ID: 29764769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
