These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23474446)

  • 1. Allergic contact dermatitis of the vulva.
    O'Gorman SM; Torgerson RR
    Dermatitis; 2013; 24(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 23474446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
    Trattner A; David M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patch-testing North American lip dermatitis patients: data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2001 to 2004.
    Zug KA; Kornik R; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM;
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 18674455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patch-test results of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006.
    Zug KA; Warshaw EM; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Belsito DL; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Mathias CG; Deleo VA; Rietschel RL; Marks J
    Dermatitis; 2009; 20(3):149-60. PubMed ID: 19470301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fragrance series testing in eyelid dermatitis.
    Wenk KS; Ehrlich A
    Dermatitis; 2012; 23(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22653065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive concomitant test reactions to allergens in the standard patch test series.
    Landeck L; González E; Baden L; Neumann K; Schalock P
    Int J Dermatol; 2010 May; 49(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 20534085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Fragrances.
    Reeder MJ
    Dermatol Clin; 2020 Jul; 38(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 32475515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Allergic contact dermatitis to preservatives and fragrances in cosmetics.
    Hamilton T; de Gannes GC
    Skin Therapy Lett; 2011 Apr; 16(4):1-4. PubMed ID: 21611680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis in Thailand.
    Boonchai W; Iamtharachai P; Sunthonpalin P
    Dermatitis; 2008; 19(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 18627686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of new fragrance mixtures.
    Larsen W; Nakayama H; Fischer T; Elsner P; Frosch P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott M; Nethercottdagger J
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9810019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. North American contact dermatitis group patch test results: 2011-2012.
    Warshaw EM; Maibach HI; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; DeKoven JG; Zirwas MJ; Fransway AF; Mathias CG; Zug KA; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Marks JG; Pratt MD; Storrs FJ; Belsito DV
    Dermatitis; 2015; 26(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 25581671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contact allergy caused by fragrance mix and Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru)--a retrospective study.
    Turić P; Lipozencić J; Milavec-Puretić V; Kulisić SM
    Coll Antropol; 2011 Mar; 35(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 21661358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The most frequent allergens in allergic contact dermatitis].
    Oppel T; Schnuch A
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 Jul; 131(28-29):1584-9. PubMed ID: 16823706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contact sensitivity in pruritus vulvae: patch test results and clinical outcome.
    Lewis FM; Shah M; Gawkrodger DJ
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 9249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
    Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
    Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genital contact dermatitis: a retrospective analysis.
    Bhate K; Landeck L; Gonzalez E; Neumann K; Schalock PC
    Dermatitis; 2010; 21(6):317-20. PubMed ID: 21144343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The significance of fragrance mix, balsam of Peru, colophony and propolis as screening tools in the detection of fragrance allergy.
    Wöhrl S; Hemmer W; Focke M; Götz M; Jarisch R
    Br J Dermatol; 2001 Aug; 145(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 11531790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patients with vulval pruritus: patch test results.
    Utaş S; Ferahbaş A; Yildiz S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 May; 58(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 18416761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008.
    Fransway AF; Zug KA; Belsito DV; Deleo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM; Dekoven J; Zirwas M
    Dermatitis; 2013; 24(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 23340394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Occupational dermatitis in health care workers evaluated for suspected allergic contact dermatitis.
    Kadivar S; Belsito DV
    Dermatitis; 2015; 26(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 26172487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.