These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23474576)

  • 21. Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health: the CONSORT statement.
    Needleman I; Worthington H; Moher D; Schulz K; Altman DG
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18435368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Survey of systematic review authors in dentistry: challenges in methodology and reporting.
    Major MP; Warren S; Flores-Mir C
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Apr; 73(4):471-82. PubMed ID: 19339434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An Overview of Systematic Reviews Related to Aspects of the Shortened Dental Arch and Its Variants in Adults.
    Khan SB; Chikte UM; Omar R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2017; 30(4):357-366. PubMed ID: 28697206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR).
    Shea BJ; Bouter LM; Peterson J; Boers M; Andersson N; Ortiz Z; Ramsay T; Bai A; Shukla VK; Grimshaw JM
    PLoS One; 2007 Dec; 2(12):e1350. PubMed ID: 18159233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of primary hypertension: a methodology overview of systematic reviews.
    Xinke Z; Yingdong L; Mingxia F; Kai L; Kaibing C; Yuqing L; Shaobo S; Peng S; Bin L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):180. PubMed ID: 27760557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testing a tool for the classification of study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed moderate reliability and low accuracy.
    Hartling L; Bond K; Santaguida PL; Viswanathan M; Dryden DM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):861-71. PubMed ID: 21531537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE?
    Mattivi JT; Buchberger B
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 27751191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evidence-based periodontology, systematic reviews and research quality.
    Needleman I; Moles DR; Worthington H
    Periodontol 2000; 2005; 37():12-28. PubMed ID: 15655022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Giannakopoulos NN
    Vet J; 2012 May; 192(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21924652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A practitioner's guide to developing critical appraisal skills: reviews of research.
    Needleman I; Clarkson J; Worthington H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 May; 144(5):527-30. PubMed ID: 23633701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ; van Vliet HA; Helmerhorst FM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study.
    Gates A; Gates M; Duarte G; Cary M; Becker M; Prediger B; Vandermeer B; Fernandes RM; Pieper D; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2018 Jun; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 29898777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: methodological assessment using of R-AMSTAR.
    Schmitter M; Sterzenbach G; Faggion CM; Krastl G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1287-94. PubMed ID: 23436119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL).
    Lucas NP; Macaskill P; Irwig L; Bogduk N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Aug; 63(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 20056381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.
    Shea BJ; Grimshaw JM; Wells GA; Boers M; Andersson N; Hamel C; Porter AC; Tugwell P; Moher D; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2007 Feb; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17302989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.