133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23475589)
1. Systolic time intervals vs invasive predictors of fluid responsiveness after coronary artery bypass surgery.
Smorenberg A; Lust EJ; Beishuizen A; Meijer JH; Verdaasdonk RM; Groeneveld AB
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Nov; 44(5):891-7. PubMed ID: 23475589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.
Préau S; Saulnier F; Dewavrin F; Durocher A; Chagnon JL
Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 20016380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of passive leg raising to predict fluid responsiveness in pediatric intensive care unit patients.
Lukito V; Djer MM; Pudjiadi AH; Munasir Z
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2012 May; 13(3):e155-60. PubMed ID: 22198809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative value of pressures and volumes in assessing fluid responsiveness after valvular and coronary artery surgery.
Breukers RM; Trof RJ; de Wilde RB; van den Berg PC; Twisk JW; Jansen JR; Groeneveld J
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 18835782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function.
Reuter DA; Kirchner A; Felbinger TW; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5):1399-404. PubMed ID: 12771609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in elderly patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
Yazigi A; Khoury E; Hlais S; Madi-Jebara S; Haddad F; Hayek G; Jabbour K
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Jun; 26(3):387-90. PubMed ID: 22100211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pulse-pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness during heart displacement for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Lee JH; Jeon Y; Bahk JH; Gil NS; Kim KB; Hong DM; Kim HJ
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Dec; 25(6):1056-62. PubMed ID: 21924634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hemodynamic pressure waveform analysis in predicting fluid responsiveness.
Roy S; Couture P; Qizilbash B; Toupin F; Levesque S; Carrier M; Lambert J; Denault AY
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2013 Aug; 27(4):676-80. PubMed ID: 23849524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of changes in cardiac index and fluid responsiveness: a comparison of Nexfin and transpulmonary thermodilution.
Fischer MO; Coucoravas J; Truong J; Zhu L; Gérard JL; Hanouz JL; Fellahi JL
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Jul; 57(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 23521161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The respiratory change in preejection period: a new method to predict fluid responsiveness.
Bendjelid K; Suter PM; Romand JA
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2004 Jan; 96(1):337-42. PubMed ID: 14660495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Arm occlusion pressure is a useful predictor of an increase in cardiac output after fluid loading following cardiac surgery.
Geerts BF; Maas J; de Wilde RB; Aarts LP; Jansen JR
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Nov; 28(11):802-6. PubMed ID: 21799416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of arterial systolic pressure variation with other clinical parameters to predict the response to fluid challenges during cardiac surgery.
Bennett-Guerrero E; Kahn RA; Moskowitz DM; Falcucci O; Bodian CA
Mt Sinai J Med; 2002; 69(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11832979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients ventilated with low tidal volume and high positive end-expiratory pressure.
Huang CC; Fu JY; Hu HC; Kao KC; Chen NH; Hsieh MJ; Tsai YH
Crit Care Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):2810-6. PubMed ID: 18766099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators.
Preisman S; Kogan S; Berkenstadt H; Perel A
Br J Anaesth; 2005 Dec; 95(6):746-55. PubMed ID: 16286349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional haemodynamic monitoring: The value of SVV as measured by the LiDCORapid™ in predicting fluid responsiveness in high risk vascular surgical patients.
Willars C; Dada A; Hughes T; Green D
Int J Surg; 2012; 10(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 22330275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of pulse pressure on the predictability of stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with coronary disease.
Kim SY; Song Y; Shim JK; Kwak YL
J Crit Care; 2013 Jun; 28(3):318.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23122680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mixed venous O2 saturation and fluid responsiveness after cardiac or major vascular surgery.
Kuiper AN; Trof RJ; Groeneveld AB
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Sep; 8():189. PubMed ID: 24053433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mini-fluid challenge can predict arterial pressure response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients under spinal anaesthesia.
Guinot PG; Bernard E; Deleporte K; Petiot S; Dupont H; Lorne E
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2015 Dec; 34(6):333-7. PubMed ID: 26541217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
