These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23477696)

  • 21. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The neural correlates of attention orienting in visuospatial working memory for detecting feature and conjunction changes.
    Yeh YY; Kuo BC; Liu HL
    Brain Res; 2007 Jan; 1130(1):146-57. PubMed ID: 17173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by gaze cues: A study of lateralized ERPs.
    Holmes A; Mogg K; Garcia LM; Bradley BP
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 20162493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cue reliability and a landmark stability heuristic determine relative weighting between egocentric and allocentric visual information in memory-guided reach.
    Byrne PA; Crawford JD
    J Neurophysiol; 2010 Jun; 103(6):3054-69. PubMed ID: 20457858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Eyes only? Perceiving eye contact is neither sufficient nor necessary for attentional capture by face direction.
    Böckler A; van der Wel RP; Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():134-40. PubMed ID: 26245915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Facilitation and inhibition caused by the orienting of attention in propositional reasoning tasks.
    Cherubini P; Mazzocco A; Minelli S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Nov; 60(11):1496-523. PubMed ID: 17853220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attentional cueing reverses deficits in spatial working memory task performance in chronic low dose MPTP-treated monkeys.
    Decamp E; Tinker JP; Schneider JS
    Behav Brain Res; 2004 Jul; 152(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 15196793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
    Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inhibition of saccadic eye movements to locations in spatial working memory.
    Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):620-31. PubMed ID: 19304651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spatial working memory load impairs manual but not saccadic inhibition of return.
    Zhang Y; Zhang M
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 20974166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
    Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Top down modulation of attention to food cues via working memory.
    Higgs S; Rutters F; Thomas JM; Naish K; Humphreys GW
    Appetite; 2012 Aug; 59(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 22450523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Exploring the switching of the focus of attention within working memory: A combined event-related potential and behavioral study.
    Frenken M; Berti S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():30-41. PubMed ID: 29476873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dissociation between appearance and location within visuo-spatial working memory.
    Darling S; Sala SD; Logie RH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):417-25. PubMed ID: 18728999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The location but not the attributes of visual cues are automatically encoded into working memory.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():76-85. PubMed ID: 25490435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Semantic influences from a brief peripheral cue depend on task set.
    Weaver MD; Phillips J; Lauwereyns J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jul; 63(7):1249-55. PubMed ID: 20419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The time it takes to turn a memory into a template.
    Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23603144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Components of working memory and visual selective attention.
    Burnham BR; Sabia M; Langan C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):391-403. PubMed ID: 23875574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.