These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23477950)

  • 1. New theoretical model to measure pressure produced during impression procedure for complete dentures-Visual inspection of impression material flow.
    Nishigawa G; Maruo Y; Irie M; Oka M; Tamada Y; Minagi S
    Dent Mater; 2013 May; 29(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 23477950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An alternative impression technique for complete dentures.
    Yilmaz B; Özçelik TB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 111(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 24286641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pressure generated on a simulated mandibular oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different design.
    Al-Ahmad A; Masri R; Driscoll CF; von Fraunhofer J; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 16650009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual observation of the dynamic flow of elastomer rubber impression material between the impression tray and oral mucosa while seating the impression tray.
    Nishigawa G; Natsuaki N; Maruo Y; Okamoto M; Minagi S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 12787458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of implant placement depth and impression material on the stability of an open tray impression coping.
    Linkevicius T; Svediene O; Vindasiute E; Puisys A; Linkeviciene L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):238-43. PubMed ID: 23031730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH; Mancl LA; Schwedhelm ER; Verhoef DR; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified fluid wax impression for a severely resorbed edentulous mandibular ridge.
    Tan KM; Singer MT; Masri R; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 19328281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of relief space and escape holes on pressure characteristics of maxillary edentulous impressions.
    Komiyama O; Saeki H; Kawara M; Kobayashi K; Otake S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 15211300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Building the edentulous impression--a layering technique using multiple viscosities of impression material.
    Massad J; Lobel W; Garcia LT; Monarres A; Hammesfahr PD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2006 Aug; 27(8):446-51; quiz 452, 468. PubMed ID: 16955716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impressions for complete dentures using new silicone impression materials.
    Hayakawa I; Watanabe I
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):177-80. PubMed ID: 12731598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure control for complete denture impressions.
    Weng BX; Khlevnoy V
    Oral Health; 1995 Nov; 85(11):21-3, 24, 27. PubMed ID: 8779757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impression tray--an important factor in impression precision.
    Rehberg HJ
    Int Dent J; 1977 Jun; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 328405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Dimensional accuracy and stability of the complete denture impression tray].
    Hitge ML; Vrijhoef MM
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1989 Aug; 96(8):372-7. PubMed ID: 2700772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.