These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23479329)

  • 1. Why rare targets are slow: evidence that the target probability effect has an attentional locus.
    Hon N; Tan CH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Apr; 75(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 23479329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rare targets are less susceptible to attention capture once detection has begun.
    Hon N; Ng G; Chan G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 26335411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The trajectory of the target probability effect.
    Hon N; Yap MJ; Jabar SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 May; 75(4):661-6. PubMed ID: 23404522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional capture by object appearance and disappearance.
    Cole GG; Kuhn G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):147-59. PubMed ID: 19396733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competition for representation is mediated by relative attentional salience.
    Mounts JR; Tomaselli RG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):261-75. PubMed ID: 15698824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the attentional demands of walking differ for older men and women living independently in the community?
    Wellmon R
    J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2012; 35(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 22441323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.
    VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowing where is different from knowing what: Distinct response time profiles and accuracy effects for target location, orientation, and color probability.
    Jabar SB; Filipowicz A; Anderson B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2338-2353. PubMed ID: 28842834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments.
    Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1574-84. PubMed ID: 25832193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning in the Target Prevalence Effect.
    Hon N; Jabar SB
    Perception; 2018 Jul; 47(7):789-798. PubMed ID: 29699446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional costs of visually guided walking: effects of age, executive function and stepping-task demands.
    Mazaheri M; Roerdink M; Bood RJ; Duysens J; Beek PJ; Peper CL
    Gait Posture; 2014; 40(1):182-6. PubMed ID: 24767613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Location probability learning requires focal attention.
    Kabata T; Yokoyama T; Noguchi Y; Kita S
    Perception; 2014; 43(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 25109022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional engagement is not sufficient to prevent spatial capture.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24043565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective attention modulates the effect of target location probability on redundant signal processing.
    Chang TY; Little DR; Yang CT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1603-24. PubMed ID: 27188653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overt attention and predictiveness in human contingency learning.
    Le Pelley ME; Beesley T; Griffiths O
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 21319915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of warnings in an attentionally demanding detection task.
    Maltz M; Meyer J
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 11592663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets.
    Thompson C; Underwood G; Crundall D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 17853197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture in schizophrenia and schizotypy: effect of attentional load.
    Ducato MG; Thomas P; Monestes JL; Despretz P; Boucart M
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2008 Mar; 13(2):89-111. PubMed ID: 18302024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Temporal and spatial characteristics of attention to facilitate manual and eye-movement responses.
    Tanaka Y; Shimojo S
    Perception; 2001; 30(3):283-302. PubMed ID: 11374201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.