These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2348018)

  • 1. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal detection in industrial noise: effects of noise exposure history, hearing loss, and the use of ear protection.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(3):161-73. PubMed ID: 4059854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aspects on personal noise protection.
    Axelsson K; Axelsson A; Jonsson A
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 756091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in efficiency of earplugs and earmuffs measured as hearing impairments from two workshops.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):194-9. PubMed ID: 6939088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attenuation characteristics of an extended-wear hearing aid: Impulse and continuous noise.
    Brungart DS; Spencer NJ; Pryor N; Abouzahra N; McKenna EA; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1404. PubMed ID: 33003895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
    Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
    J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
    Alberti PW; Riko K
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise].
    Murakami M; Hirota Y; Ohwada H; Kanemitsu K
    Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Mar; 26(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 6503014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of improved hearing protection regulations in the prevention of military noise-induced hearing loss.
    Mrena R; Ylikoski J; Kiukaanniemi H; Mäkitie AA; Savolainen S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Sep; 128(9):997-1003. PubMed ID: 19086196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part I: Review of previous work and the design of an improved test fixture.
    Schroeter J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1065-81. PubMed ID: 3700862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
    Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP
    J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Prevalence and characterization of hearing loss in workers exposed to industrial noise of the turbogenerated electric plant of a petrochemical industry].
    Montiel-López M; Corzo-Alvarez G; Chacín-Almarza B; Rojas-González L; Quevedo A; Rendiles H
    Invest Clin; 2006 Jun; 47(2):117-31. PubMed ID: 16886774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise exposures. Effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss.
    Lusk SL
    AAOHN J; 1997 Aug; 45(8):397-408; quiz 409-10. PubMed ID: 9341314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.