122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2348149)
1. Cervical cancer screening and registration--are they working?
Choyce A; McAvoy BR
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1990 Mar; 44(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 2348149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s.
Mitchell H; Medley G; Giles G
BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6740):1622-6. PubMed ID: 2372641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Audit of deaths from cervical cancer: proposal for an essential component of the National Screening Programme.
Slater DN; Milner PC; Radley H
J Clin Pathol; 1994 Jan; 47(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 8132804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Are analyses of cytological cervix smears from young women more harmful than beneficial?].
Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B; Hagmar B; Iversen OE; Juvkam KH; Steen R; Thoresen S; Hareide B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jun; 127(13):1782-5. PubMed ID: 17599128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recommendations for cervical screening 1997. Members of the Working Party on Cervical Screening.
N Z Med J; 1998 Mar; 111(1062):94-8. PubMed ID: 9577460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
Lynge E; Poll P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Fitzroy Valley Pap Smear Register. Cervical screening in a population of Australian aboriginal women.
Mak DB; Straton JA
Med J Aust; 1993 Feb; 158(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 8450781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prophylactic cytological investigation for cervical cancer in relation to stage at diagnosis: a study of 420 women in Denmark.
Olesen F
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1988 Aug; 38(313):356-9. PubMed ID: 3256647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of screening in reducing invasive cervical cancer registrations in England.
Fouquet R; Gage H
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(2):90-6. PubMed ID: 8849768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening frequency and histologic type influence the efficacy of cervical cancer screening: A nationwide cohort study.
Chiang YC; Chen YY; Hsieh SF; Chiang CJ; You SL; Cheng WF; Lai MS; Chen CA;
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 56(4):442-448. PubMed ID: 28805598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Follow-up of non-negative cervical cytological smears in the county of Funen].
Dahl MB; Hølund B; Sørensen B; Ahrons S; Grinsted P; Poulsen EF
Ugeskr Laeger; 1998 Sep; 160(40):5798-801. PubMed ID: 9782760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cytology screening history of women diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a case-control study.
Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 15471249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire.
Paterson ME; Peel KR; Joslin CA
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Oct; 289(6449):896-8. PubMed ID: 6434133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for cancer of the cervix in elderly women.
Fletcher A
Lancet; 1990 Jan; 335(8681):97-9. PubMed ID: 1967429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
