These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23483111)

  • 21. Perceived blur in naturally contoured images depends on phase.
    Murray S; Bex PJ
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():185. PubMed ID: 21833246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trends in image quality in high magnification digital specimen cabinet radiography.
    Birch IP; Kotre CJ; Padgett R
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):239-43. PubMed ID: 16498037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Luminance Enhancement and Detail Preservation of Images and Videos Adapted to Ambient Illumination.
    Song Q; Cosman PC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Oct; 27(10):4901-4915. PubMed ID: 29969400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Understanding the Impact of Individual Perceived Image Quality Features on Visual Performance.
    Benoit JS; Ravikumar A; Marsack JD; Anderson HA
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 9(5):7. PubMed ID: 32821479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of magnification views on the characterization of microcalcifications in digital mammography.
    Fallenberg EM; Dimitrijevic L; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Kettritz U; Poellinger A; Bick U; Winzer KJ; Engelken F; Renz DM
    Rofo; 2014 Mar; 186(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 23999780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correction of spatially varying image and video motion blur using a hybrid camera.
    Tai YW; Du H; Brown MS; Lin S
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2010 Jun; 32(6):1012-28. PubMed ID: 20431128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Space-time super-resolution using graph-cut optimization.
    Mudenagudi U; Banerjee S; Kalra PK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2011 May; 33(5):995-1008. PubMed ID: 20733227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Video microscopic image processing facilitates the evaluation of light microscopic autoradiography at high magnification.
    Montag M; Trendelenburg MF; Spring H
    J Microsc; 1988 Jun; 150(Pt 3):245-9. PubMed ID: 3172186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast, noise, and blur affect performance and appreciation of digital radiographs.
    van Overveld IM
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Nov; 8(4):168-79. PubMed ID: 8573626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An evaluation of a video magnification-based system for respiratory rate monitoring in an acute mental health setting.
    Laurie J; Higgins N; Peynot T; Fawcett L; Roberts J
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Apr; 148():104378. PubMed ID: 33486356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lagrange time delay estimation for scanning electron microscope image magnification.
    Sim KS; Thong LW; Ting HY; Tso CP
    J Microsc; 2010 Feb; 237(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 20096041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
    Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantification of the magnification and distortion effects of a pediatric flexible video-bronchoscope.
    Masters IB; Eastburn MM; Francis PW; Wootton R; Zimmerman PV; Ware RS; Chang AB
    Respir Res; 2005 Feb; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 15705204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video.
    Haun AM; Peli E
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23857949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can electronic zoom replace magnification in mammography? A comparative Monte Carlo study.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Pascoal A; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Panayiotakis G
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 83(991):569-77. PubMed ID: 20603409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of breast thickness and lesion location on resolution in digital magnification mammography.
    Park HS; Oh Y; Kim ST; Kim HJ
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 22726961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On Bayesian adaptive video super resolution.
    Liu C; Sun D
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2014 Feb; 36(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 24356354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Digital zoom of the full-field digital mammogram versus magnification mammography: a systematic review.
    Øynes M; Strøm B; Tveito B; Hafslund B
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4223-4233. PubMed ID: 32222798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Radiographic enlargement in the study of hand diseases. Digital versus conventional techniques].
    Nessi R; Pozzato C; Castellana L; Paruccini N; Blanc M
    Radiol Med; 1994 May; 87(5):597-602. PubMed ID: 8008888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.