These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2348358)

  • 21. Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning.
    Kemp C; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):20-58. PubMed ID: 19159147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [How does model- and situation-specific lack of knowledge affect causal inferences?].
    Molz G
    Z Exp Psychol; 2000; 47(3):219-28;. PubMed ID: 10949906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conditional probability versus spatial contiguity in causal learning: Preschoolers use new contingency evidence to overcome prior spatial assumptions.
    Kushnir T; Gopnik A
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Jan; 43(1):186-96. PubMed ID: 17201518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Relative informativeness of quantifiers used in syllogistic reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Roberts L; Chater N
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 11958347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mechanisms of predictive and diagnostic causal induction.
    Cobos PL; López FJ; Caño A; Almaraz J; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2002 Oct; 28(4):331-46. PubMed ID: 12395491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Harry Potter and the sorcerer's scope: latent scope biases in explanatory reasoning.
    Khemlani SS; Sussman AB; Oppenheimer DM
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):527-35. PubMed ID: 21264612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [When generative and preventive mechanisms meet with compatible and incompatible information in casual reasoning probability].
    Desrochers S; Walsh S; Sacy M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Sep; 66(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 22506877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Information selection and use in hypothesis testing: what is a good question, and what is a good answer?
    Slowiaczek LM; Klayman J; Sherman SJ; Skov RB
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):392-405. PubMed ID: 1495401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.
    Tenenbaum JB; Griffiths TL; Kemp C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Causal knowledge and categories: the effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity.
    Rehder B; Hastie R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Sep; 130(3):323-60. PubMed ID: 11561914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A theory of causal learning in children: causal maps and Bayes nets.
    Gopnik A; Glymour C; Sobel DM; Schulz LE; Kushnir T; Danks D
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):3-32. PubMed ID: 14756583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Edge replacement and minimality as models of causal inference in children.
    Buchanan DW; Sobel DM
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2014; 46():183-213. PubMed ID: 24851350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks.
    Oppenheimer DM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 14738516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On people's understanding of the diagnostic implications of probabilistic data.
    Doherty ME; Chadwick R; Garavan H; Barr D; Mynatt CR
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Sep; 24(5):644-54. PubMed ID: 8870533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rational variability in children's causal inferences: the Sampling Hypothesis.
    Denison S; Bonawitz E; Gopnik A; Griffiths TL
    Cognition; 2013 Feb; 126(2):285-300. PubMed ID: 23200511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Typicality and reasoning fallacies.
    Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN
    Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attributions of blame and responsibility in sexual harassment: reexamining a psychological model.
    Klein KM; Apple KJ; Kahn AS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 20143140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Probabilities and polarity biases in conditional inference.
    Oaksford M; Chater N; Larkin J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):883-99. PubMed ID: 10946369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Domain generality and specificity in children's causal inference about ambiguous data.
    Sobel DM; Munro SE
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Mar; 45(2):511-24. PubMed ID: 19271835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When wrong predictions provide more support than right ones.
    McKenzie CR; Amin MB
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):821-8. PubMed ID: 12613689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.