237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23484557)
1. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI
JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy: effect on cost and complications.
Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Cohen SL; Wright KN; Shah NT; Chavan N; Einarsson JI
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 117(5):1142-1149. PubMed ID: 21508754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with traditional hysterectomy for cost-effectiveness to employers.
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Cammarano C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 190(6):1714-20; discussion 1720-2. PubMed ID: 15284779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.
Warren L; Ladapo JA; Borah BJ; Gunnarsson CL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 19835801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.
Tapper AM; Hannola M; Zeitlin R; Isojärvi J; Sintonen H; Ikonen TS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():1-10. PubMed ID: 24703710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy.
Woelk JL; Borah BJ; Trabuco EC; Heien HC; Gebhart JB
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 123(2 Pt 1):255-262. PubMed ID: 24402586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Shepherd JP; Kantartzis KL; Ahn KH; Bonidie MJ; Lee T
JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Costs and charges associated with three alternative techniques of hysterectomy.
Dorsey JH; Holtz PM; Griffiths RI; McGrath MM; Steinberg EP
N Engl J Med; 1996 Aug; 335(7):476-82. PubMed ID: 8672153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.
Martino MA; Berger EA; McFetridge JT; Shubella J; Gosciniak G; Wejkszner T; Kainz GF; Patriarco J; Thomas MB; Boulay R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 24513969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches.
Landeen LB; Bell MC; Hubert HB; Bennis LY; Knutsen-Larson SS; Seshadri-Kreaden U
S D Med; 2011 Jun; 64(6):197-9, 201, 203 passim. PubMed ID: 21710804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Harris MB; Olive DL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):340-3; discussion 343-4. PubMed ID: 8059810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Smorgick N; Patzkowsky KE; Hoffman MR; Advincula AP; Song AH; As-Sanie S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 289(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 23839534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
