197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23484558)
1. Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing vicryl to barbed sutures.
Nawfal AK; Eisenstein D; Theoharis E; Dahlman M; Wegienka G
JSLS; 2012; 16(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 23484558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Barbed Suture versus Conventional Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
López CC; Ríos JFL; González Y; Vásquez-Trespalacios EM; Serna D; Arango A; Cifuentes C; Vásquez R; Castañeda JD; Almanza LA; Jiménez LA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1104-1109. PubMed ID: 30414998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dramatically reduced incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence in gynecologic patients undergoing endoscopic closure with barbed sutures: A retrospective cohort study.
Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Mendivil AA; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Int J Surg; 2015 Jul; 19():27-30. PubMed ID: 25980394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of barbed unidirectional suture with figure-of-eight standard sutures in vaginal cuff closure in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Karacan T; Ozyurek E; Usta T; Odacilar E; Hanli U; Kovalak E; Dayan H
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Aug; 38(6):842-847. PubMed ID: 29577776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Barbed versus conventional 2-layer continuous running sutures for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
Kim JH; Byun SW; Song JY; Kim YH; Lee HJ; Park TC; Lee KH; Hur SY; Park JS; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Sep; 95(39):e4981. PubMed ID: 27684850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Medina BC; Giraldo CH; Riaño G; Hoyos LR; Otalora C
JSLS; 2014; 18(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24680149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. V-Loc™ 180 suture in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a retrospective study comparing Polysorb to barbed suture used for vaginal cuff closure.
Cong L; Li C; Wei B; Zhan L; Wang W; Xu Y
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Dec; 207():18-22. PubMed ID: 27816737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Kim SM; Baek JM; Song JY; Lee SJ; Park EK; Kim CJ; Lee YS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Mar; 297(3):691-697. PubMed ID: 29289989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Barbed versus standard suture: a randomized trial for laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure.
Einarsson JI; Cohen SL; Gobern JM; Sandberg EM; Hill-Lydecker CI; Wang K; Brown DN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 23680517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-layer versus double-layer closure of the vaginal cuff with barbed sutures in laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Yildirim D; Ozyurek SE; Kiyak H; Han A; Koroglu N; Bestel A; Topbas F
Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(5):229-234. PubMed ID: 30084473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unidirectional Barbed Suture Versus Polyglactin 910 Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Khoiwal K; Kapoor N; Gaurav A; Kumari O; Chaturvedi J
Cureus; 2021 Apr; 13(4):e14257. PubMed ID: 33954069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between unidirectional barbed and polyglactin 910 suture in vaginal cuff closure in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Morgan-Ortiz F; Contreras-Soto JO; Soto-Pineda JM; Zepeda MA; Peraza-Garay FJ
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():143-8. PubMed ID: 23860935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unidirectional barbed suture versus interrupted vicryl suture in vaginal cuff healing during robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Zhou Y; Guthrie G; Chuang A; Faro JP; Ali V
J Robot Surg; 2014 Sep; 8(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 27637678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unidirectional barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure without backward stitch in total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Misirlioglu S; Boza A; Arslan T; Urman B; Taskiran C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1793-1799. PubMed ID: 30019797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of 2 methods of vaginal cuff closure during robotic hysterectomy.
Neubauer NL; Schink PJ; Pant A; Singh D; Lurain JR; Schink JC
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 120(1):99-101. PubMed ID: 23040405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Barbed suture in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bogliolo S; Musacchi V; Dominoni M; Cassani C; Gaggero CR; De Silvestri A; Gardella B; Spinillo A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 292(3):489-97. PubMed ID: 25700658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Retrospective Review of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence: Comparing Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures.
MacKoul P; Danilyants N; Sarfoh V; van der Does L; Kazi N
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 30853572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without the use of barbed suture.
Bassi A; Tulandi T
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):718-722. PubMed ID: 24007707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence and Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uccella S; Zorzato PC; Kho RM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):710-720. PubMed ID: 33348012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]