These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23484561)
1. Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. Orady M; Hrynewych A; Nawfal AK; Wegienka G JSLS; 2012; 16(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 23484561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing vicryl to barbed sutures. Nawfal AK; Eisenstein D; Theoharis E; Dahlman M; Wegienka G JSLS; 2012; 16(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 23484558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hospital costs of total vaginal hysterectomy compared with other minimally invasive hysterectomy. Dayaratna S; Goldberg J; Harrington C; Leiby BE; McNeil JM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 210(2):120.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24060444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Shashoua AR; Gill D; Locher SR JSLS; 2009; 13(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 19793478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized comparison of vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, and total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with benign uterine disease. Drahonovsky J; Haakova L; Otcenasek M; Krofta L; Kucera E; Feyereisl J Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Feb; 148(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19926201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of the impact of previous laparoscopic hysterectomy experience on the learning curve for robotic hysterectomy. Eddib A; Jain N; Aalto M; Hughes S; Eswar A; Erk M; Michalik C; Krovi V; Singhal P J Robot Surg; 2013 Sep; 7(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 27000926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri. Sesti F; Cosi V; Calonzi F; Ruggeri V; Pietropolli A; Di Francesco L; Piccione E Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 290(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 24710800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy. Song T; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 26075931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Shin JW; Lee HH; Lee SP; Park CY JSLS; 2011; 15(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 21902979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications. Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus standard laparoscopic hysterectomy. Winter ML; Leu SY; Lagrew DC; Bustillo G J Robot Surg; 2015 Dec; 9(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 26530837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM]. Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of classic intrafascial supracervical hysterectomy with total laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Kim DH; Bae DH; Hur M; Kim SH J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1998 Aug; 5(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 9668147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Long CY; Fang JH; Chen WC; Su JH; Hsu SC Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 53(4):214-9. PubMed ID: 12186986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does size matter? The effect of uterine weight on robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes. Orady ME; Karim Nawfal A; Wegienka G J Robot Surg; 2011 Dec; 5(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 27628116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients. Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]