These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23484900)

  • 1. Enrichment factor analyses on G-protein coupled receptors with known crystal structure.
    Anighoro A; Rastelli G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):739-43. PubMed ID: 23484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
    Kooistra AJ; Roumen L; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():279-336. PubMed ID: 23374191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ligand and decoy sets for docking to G protein-coupled receptors.
    Gatica EA; Cavasotto CN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22168315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
    Evers A; Hessler G; Matter H; Klabunde T
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure-based virtual screening of MT2 melatonin receptor: influence of template choice and structural refinement.
    Pala D; Beuming T; Sherman W; Lodola A; Rivara S; Mor M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):821-35. PubMed ID: 23541165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.
    Shacham S; Marantz Y; Bar-Haim S; Kalid O; Warshaviak D; Avisar N; Inbal B; Heifetz A; Fichman M; Topf M; Naor Z; Noiman S; Becker OM
    Proteins; 2004 Oct; 57(1):51-86. PubMed ID: 15326594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benchmarking the performance of MM/PBSA in virtual screening enrichment using the GPCR-Bench dataset.
    Yau MQ; Emtage AL; Loo JSE
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Nov; 34(11):1133-1145. PubMed ID: 32851579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fitting the complexity of GPCRs modulation into simple hypotheses of ligand design.
    Custodi C; Nuti R; Oprea TI; Macchiarulo A
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Sep; 38():70-81. PubMed ID: 23079642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the CXCR4 structure on docking-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors.
    Planesas JM; Pérez-Nueno VI; Borrell JI; Teixidó J
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Sep; 38():123-36. PubMed ID: 23079643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current assessment of docking into GPCR crystal structures and homology models: successes, challenges, and guidelines.
    Beuming T; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3263-77. PubMed ID: 23121495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of G-protein coupled receptor models in lead optimization.
    Tautermann CS
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):709-21. PubMed ID: 21554077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Molecular modeling of vasopressin receptor and in silico screening of V1b receptor antagonists.
    Hagiwara Y; Ohno K; Kamohara M; Takasaki J; Watanabe T; Fukunishi Y; Nakamura H; Orita M
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2013 Aug; 8(8):951-64. PubMed ID: 23682717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC; Humblet C; Joseph-McCarthy D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs.
    Lim VJY; Du W; Chen YZ; Fan H
    Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):978-989. PubMed ID: 30051928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended template-based modeling and evaluation method using consensus of binding mode of GPCRs for virtual screening.
    Sato M; Hirokawa T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3153-61. PubMed ID: 25350693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Docking and Virtual Screening Strategies for GPCR Drug Discovery.
    Beuming T; Lenselink B; Pala D; McRobb F; Repasky M; Sherman W
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1335():251-76. PubMed ID: 26260606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding ligands for G protein-coupled receptors based on the protein-compound affinity matrix.
    Fukunishi Y; Kubota S; Nakamura H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jan; 25(5):633-43. PubMed ID: 16777448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of Monte Carlo-based receptor ensemble docking to virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
    Vilar S; Costanzi S
    Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():263-78. PubMed ID: 23374190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Virtual Screening of Human Class-A GPCRs Using Ligand Profiles Built on Multiple Ligand-Receptor Interactions.
    Chan WKB; Zhang Y
    J Mol Biol; 2020 Aug; 432(17):4872-4890. PubMed ID: 32652079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A virtual screen for diverse ligands: discovery of selective G protein-coupled receptor antagonists.
    Engel S; Skoumbourdis AP; Childress J; Neumann S; Deschamps JR; Thomas CJ; Colson AO; Costanzi S; Gershengorn MC
    J Am Chem Soc; 2008 Apr; 130(15):5115-23. PubMed ID: 18357984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.