These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23485509)

  • 1. Assessment of a modified acoustic lens for electromagnetic shock wave lithotripters in a swine model.
    Mancini JG; Neisius A; Smith N; Sankin G; Astroza GM; Lipkin ME; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):1096-101. PubMed ID: 23485509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.
    Neisius A; Smith NB; Sankin G; Kuntz NJ; Madden JF; Fovargue DE; Mitran S; Lipkin ME; Simmons WN; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Apr; 111(13):E1167-75. PubMed ID: 24639497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig.
    Evan AP; McAteer JA; Connors BA; Pishchalnikov YA; Handa RK; Blomgren P; Willis LR; Williams JC; Lingeman JE; Gao S
    BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):382-8. PubMed ID: 17922871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.
    Xing Y; Chen TT; Simmons WN; Sankin G; Cocks FH; Lipkin ME; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):502-509. PubMed ID: 28340536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lithotripter outcomes in a community practice setting: comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter.
    Bhojani N; Mandeville JA; Hameed TA; Soergel TM; McAteer JA; Williams JC; Krambeck AE; Lingeman JE
    J Urol; 2015 Mar; 193(3):875-9. PubMed ID: 25305356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stone comminution correlates with the average peak pressure incident on a stone during shock wave lithotripsy.
    Smith N; Zhong P
    J Biomech; 2012 Oct; 45(15):2520-5. PubMed ID: 22935690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A heuristic model of stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Smith NB; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1548-58. PubMed ID: 23927195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shifting the Split Reflectors to Enhance Stone Fragmentation of Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
    Wang JC; Zhou Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1876-89. PubMed ID: 27166016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhou Y; Cocks FH; Preminger GM; Zhong P
    J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):349-54. PubMed ID: 15201809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of treatment strategy used during shockwave lithotripsy to maximize stone fragmentation efficiency.
    Yong DZ; Lipkin ME; Simmons WN; Sankin G; Albala DM; Zhong P; Preminger GM
    J Endourol; 2011 Sep; 25(9):1507-11. PubMed ID: 21834658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of tissue injury from focused ultrasonic propulsion of kidney stones versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Connors BA; Evan AP; Blomgren PM; Hsi RS; Harper JD; Sorensen MD; Wang YN; Simon JC; Paun M; Starr F; Cunitz BW; Bailey MR; Lingeman JE
    J Urol; 2014 Jan; 191(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 23917165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Pediatric Stone Disease: A 15-Year Single-Center Experience with 2 Types of Lithotripters.
    Zisman A; Assadi A; Goldin O; Malshy K; Nativ O; Meretyk S; Amiel GE; Mullerad M; Livne PM
    Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1260-1264. PubMed ID: 35172318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Size and location of defects at the coupling interface affect lithotripter performance.
    Li G; Williams JC; Pishchalnikov YA; Liu Z; McAteer JA
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E871-7. PubMed ID: 22938566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of an electromagnetic and an electrohydraulic lithotripter: Efficacy, pain and complications.
    Bianchi G; Marega D; Knez R; Bucci S; Trombetta C
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2018 Sep; 90(3):169-171. PubMed ID: 30362681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Update on shock wave lithotripsy technology.
    Auge BK; Preminger GM
    Curr Opin Urol; 2002 Jul; 12(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 12072648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single center, single operator comparative study of the effectiveness of electrohydraulic and electromagnetic lithotripters in the management of 10- to 20-mm single upper urinary tract calculi.
    Jamshaid A; Ather MH; Hussain G; Khawaja KB
    Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):991-5. PubMed ID: 18822451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using Dornier modified HM3 lithotripter comparison with the results by Dornier HM3 lithotripter].
    Sugiyama T; Itho M; Katho N; Sahashi M; Watanabe J; Yamada S; Kamihira O; Mizutani K; Ono Y
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Mar; 82(3):462-6. PubMed ID: 2072608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal model.
    Paterson RF; Lifshitz DA; Lingeman JE; Evan AP; Connors BA; Fineberg NS; Williams JC; McAteer JA
    J Urol; 2002 Nov; 168(5):2211-5. PubMed ID: 12394761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera.
    Bohris C; Roosen A; Dickmann M; Hocaoglu Y; Sandner S; Bader M; Stief CG; Walther S
    J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 22100005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Renal Stone Comminution and Injury by Burst Wave Lithotripsy in a Pig Model.
    Maxwell AD; Wang YN; Kreider W; Cunitz BW; Starr F; Lee D; Nazari Y; Williams JC; Bailey MR; Sorensen MD
    J Endourol; 2019 Oct; 33(10):787-792. PubMed ID: 31016998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.