183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23485575)
1. Agreement between spirometers: a challenge in the follow-up of patients and populations?
Gerbase MW; Dupuis-Lozeron E; Schindler C; Keidel D; Bridevaux PO; Kriemler S; Probst-Hensch NM; Rochat T; Künzli N
Respiration; 2013; 85(6):505-14. PubMed ID: 23485575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability.
Aardal ME; Svendsen LL; Lehmann S; Eagan TM; Haaland I
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Oct; 10(1):497. PubMed ID: 29017612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Considerations in the use of different spirometers in epidemiological studies.
Milanzi EB; Koppelman GH; Oldenwening M; Augustijn S; Aalders-de Ruijter B; Farenhorst M; Vonk JM; Tewis M; Brunekreef B; Gehring U
Environ Health; 2019 Apr; 18(1):39. PubMed ID: 31023382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility and validity of a handheld spirometer.
Barr RG; Stemple KJ; Mesia-Vela S; Basner RC; Derk SJ; Henneberger PK; Milton DK; Taveras B
Respir Care; 2008 Apr; 53(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 18364054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Validation of the Spirohome Clinic Ultrasonic Spirometer in Child and Adolescent Patients.
Sekerel BE; Unsal H; Sahiner UM; Uysal Soyer O; Damadoglu E; Karakaya G; Kalyoncu AF
J Asthma Allergy; 2022; 15():219-229. PubMed ID: 35210788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal validity of spirometers--a challenge in longitudinal studies.
Künzli N; Kuna-Dibbert B; Keidel D; Keller R; Brändli O; Schindler C; Schweinzer KM; Leuenberger P; Ackermann-Liebrich U;
Swiss Med Wkly; 2005 Aug; 135(33-34):503-8. PubMed ID: 16208589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a handheld turbine spirometer to conventional spirometry in children with cystic fibrosis.
Avdimiretz N; Wilson D; Grasemann H
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):1394-1399. PubMed ID: 32203645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An Interrater Reliability Study of Pulmonary Function Assessment With a Portable Spirometer.
Zhang H; Li L; Jiao D; Yang Y; Pan C; Ye L; Wei S; Jin M
Respir Care; 2020 May; 65(5):665-672. PubMed ID: 32019850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of the reliability of 2 portable electronic spirometers].
Tschopp JM; Roulin JP; Juilland A; Erné R
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1988 Sep; 118(38):1382-5. PubMed ID: 3187474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hand-held turbine spirometer: agreement with the conventional spirometer at baseline and after exercise.
Korhonen H; Remes ST; Kannisto S; Korppi M
Pediatr Allergy Immunol; 2005 May; 16(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 15853956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of a handheld portable spirometer.
Rebuck DA; Hanania NA; D'Urzo AD; Chapman KR
Chest; 1996 Jan; 109(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 8549178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relevance of a portable spirometer for detection of small airways obstruction.
Ezzahir N; Leske V; Peiffer C; Trang H
Pediatr Pulmonol; 2005 Feb; 39(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 15573392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standardization of different spirometers.
Ali BA; Abro YM; Javed NH; Islam MS
Respiration; 1988; 53(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 3387691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of a portable spirometer in the communities of China.
Xiao S; Wu F; Wang Z; Chen J; Yang H; Zheng Y; Deng Z; Peng J; Wen X; Huang P; Dai C; Lu L; Zhao N; Ran P; Zhou Y
BMC Pulm Med; 2022 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 35248001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences and agreement between two portable hand-held spirometers across diverse community-based populations in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study.
Duong M; Rangarajan S; Zaman M; Nasir NM; Seron P; Yeates K; Yusufali AM; Khatib R; Tse LA; Wang C; Wielgosz A; Teo K; Kumar R; Avezum A; Ismail R; Çalık BT; Gopakumar S; Rahman O; Zatońska K; Rosengren A; Otero J; Kelishadi R; Diaz R; Puoane T; Yusuf S
PLOS Glob Public Health; 2022; 2(2):e0000141. PubMed ID: 36962310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical and functional assessment of 10 office spirometers: A multicenter comparative study.
Liistro G; Vanwelde C; Vincken W; Vandevoorde J; Verleden G; Buffels J;
Chest; 2006 Sep; 130(3):657-65. PubMed ID: 16963659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a new desktop spirometer (Spirospec) with a laboratory spirometer in a respiratory out-patient clinic.
Swart F; Schuurmans MM; Heydenreich JC; Pieper CH; Bolliger CT
Respir Care; 2003 Jun; 48(6):591-5. PubMed ID: 12780945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of an app-based portable spirometer in adolescents with asthma.
Ring B; Burbank AJ; Mills K; Ivins S; Dieffenderfer J; Hernandez ML
J Asthma; 2021 Apr; 58(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 31810411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical comparison of two electronic spirometers with a water-sealed spirometer.
Shanks DE; Morris JF
Chest; 1976 Apr; 69(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 1261311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of a handheld "disposable pneumotachograph device" in the spirometric diagnosis of airway obstruction in a Chinese population.
Chen G; Jiang L; Wang L; Zhang W; Castillo C; Fang X
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis; 2018; 13():2351-2360. PubMed ID: 30122915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
