BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23486144)

  • 1. Long-term effects of breast aging in patients undergoing explantation: analysis of breast aesthetics from before augmentation to after explantation.
    Paydar KZ; Kohan E; Hansen SL; Roostaeian J; Gradinger GP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 70(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 23486144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.
    Khan UD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19841968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One-Stage Mastopexy-Lipofilling after Implant Removal in Cosmetic Breast Surgery.
    Mangialardi ML; Ozil C; Lepage C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2022 Aug; 46(4):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 35064339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast Auto-augmentation (Mastopexy and Lipofilling): An Option for Quitting Breast Implants.
    Graf RM; Closs Ono MC; Pace D; Balbinot P; Pazio ALB; de Paula DR
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(5):1133-1141. PubMed ID: 31065751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An outcome analysis of 100 women after explantation of silicone gel breast implants.
    Peters W; Smith D; Fornasier V; Lugowski S; Ibanez D
    Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Jul; 39(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 9229086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient retention and replacement trends after saline breast implants: are deflations inflationary?
    Stevens WG; Pacella SJ; Hirsch E; Stoker DA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 18752020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Immediate permanent implant reconstruction following mastectomy with capsule preservation in patients with prior augmentation mammoplasty.
    Elliott LF; Chu CK; Daniel J; Harper G; Bergey P
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):S103-6. PubMed ID: 24401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of local complications following explantation of silicone breast implants.
    Siggelkow W; Klosterhalfen B; Klinge U; Rath W; Faridi A
    Breast; 2004 Apr; 13(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15019692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conservative augmentation with periareolar mastopexy reduces complications and treats a variety of breast types: a 5-year retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients.
    Cannon CL; Lindsey JT
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):516-21. PubMed ID: 20395815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mastectomy with breast reconstruction in previously augmented patients: indications for implant removal.
    Robbins CM; Long JN; Fix RJ; de la Torre JI; Vasconez LO
    Ann Plast Surg; 2008 Nov; 61(5):500-5. PubMed ID: 18948775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aesthetic management of the breast following explantation: evaluation and mastopexy options.
    Rohrich RJ; Beran SJ; Restifo RJ; Copit SE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Mar; 101(3):827-37. PubMed ID: 9500406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contemporary decision making and perception in patients undergoing cosmetic breast augmentation.
    Walden JL; Panagopoulous G; Shrader SW
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010; 30(3):395-403. PubMed ID: 20601563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Outcomes analysis of patients undergoing autoaugmentation after breast implant removal.
    Gurunluoglu R; Sacak B; Arton J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):304-315. PubMed ID: 23897329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Not All Breast Implants Are Equal: A 13-Year Review of Implant Longevity and Reasons for Explantation.
    Van Slyke AC; Carr M; Carr NJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Sep; 142(3):281e-289e. PubMed ID: 29879005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors of postoperative aesthetics following explantation of the augmented breast.
    Fee TE; Caffee HH
    Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Mar; 38(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 9088457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Silicone lymphadenopathy after breast augmentation: case reports, review of the literature, and current thoughts.
    Zambacos GJ; Molnar C; Mandrekas AD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):278-89. PubMed ID: 23354761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do patients seek revisionary breast surgery?
    Grewal NS; Fisher J
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Feb; 33(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 23388645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.