117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23486410)
1. Pretension effects of the Dynesys cord on the tissue responses and screw-spacer behaviors of the lumbosacral construct with hybrid fixation.
Chien CY; Tan CH; Lu TH; Lin SC; Chuang WH; Chiang MC; Luh YP; Chen YJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E775-82. PubMed ID: 23486410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kinematic and mechanical comparisons of lumbar hybrid fixation using Dynesys and Cosmic systems.
Chien CY; Kuo YJ; Lin SC; Chuang WH; Luh YP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jul; 39(15):E878-84. PubMed ID: 24827511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical effects of disc degeneration and hybrid fixation on the transition and adjacent lumbar segments: trade-off between junctional problem, motion preservation, and load protection.
Chuang WH; Lin SC; Chen SH; Wang CW; Tsai WC; Chen YJ; Hwang JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(24):E1488-97. PubMed ID: 22872225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparisons of dynamic fixators with rod-rod and screw-spacer joints on lumbar hybrid fixation.
Xu YK; Weng PW; Chen SH; Lin SC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Apr; 104():105943. PubMed ID: 37040676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of cord pretension and stiffness of the Dynesys system spacer on the biomechanics of spinal decompression- a finite element study.
Shih SL; Liu CL; Huang LY; Huang CH; Chen CS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jun; 14():191. PubMed ID: 23777265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of Dynesys system screw profile on adjacent segment and screw.
Liu CL; Zhong ZC; Shih SL; Hung C; Lee YE; Chen CS
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):410-7. PubMed ID: 20683426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screws' insertion angle and position on the superior adjacent segment in 1 segment lumbar fusion.
Kim HJ; Chun HJ; Kang KT; Moon SH; Kim HS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim BR; Sohn JS; Ko YN; Lee HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):1637-44. PubMed ID: 22089393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of the cord pretension of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Liu CL; Zhong ZC; Hsu HW; Shih SL; Wang ST; Hung C; Chen CS
Eur Spine J; 2011 Nov; 20(11):1850-8. PubMed ID: 21523456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of spacer diameter of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system on the biomechanics of the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Shih SL; Chen CS; Lin HM; Huang LY; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jul; 25(5):E140-9. PubMed ID: 22744611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Comparison between Isobar and Dynamic-Transitional Optima (DTO) Hybrid Lumbar Fixators: A Lumbosacral Finite Element and Intersegmental Motion Analysis.
Chen SH; Hsiao CK; Wang CW; Chen HH; Zhong ZC
Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():8273853. PubMed ID: 35845942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of dynamic posterior stabilization on facet joint contact forces: an in vitro investigation.
Niosi CA; Wilson DC; Zhu Q; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Oxland TR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18165744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.
Niosi CA; Zhu QA; Wilson DC; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Oxland TR
Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):913-22. PubMed ID: 16217663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics of dynamic rod segments for achieving transitional stiffness with lumbosacral fusion.
Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Newcomb AG; Yaqoobi AS; Brasiliense LB; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2013 Sep; 73(3):517-27. PubMed ID: 23756746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison among load-, ROM-, and displacement-controlled methods used in the lumbosacral nonlinear finite-element analysis.
Chuang WH; Kuo YJ; Lin SC; Wang CW; Chen SH; Chen YJ; Hwang JR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E276-85. PubMed ID: 23250233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro biomechanical study to quantify range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and facet force of 3-level dynamic stabilization constructs with decreased stiffness.
Lee JK; Gomez J; Michelsen C; Kim Y; Moldavsky M; Chinthakunta SR; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22):1913-9. PubMed ID: 23921330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.
Erbulut DU; Zafarparandeh I; Hassan CR; Lazoglu I; Ozer AF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):200-8. PubMed ID: 25932601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure.
Kim HJ; Chun HJ; Kang KT; Lee HM; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
Yonsei Med J; 2015 Jan; 56(1):146-53. PubMed ID: 25510758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Types of spinal instability that require interbody support in posterior lumbar reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical investigation.
Oda I; Abumi K; Yu BS; Sudo H; Minami A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1573-80. PubMed ID: 12865847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
