286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23486504)
1. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry.
Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; Selleri P
Vet Rec; 2013 Apr; 172(15):396. PubMed ID: 23486504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
Pereira FQ; Bercht BS; Soares MG; da Mota MG; Pigatto JA
Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep; 14(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 21929609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes.
Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by use of a rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer in dogs before and after elective phacoemulsification.
Thompson-Hom AL; Gerding PA
Am J Vet Res; 2012 May; 73(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 22533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on rebound tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Lam AK; Wu R; Wang Z; Woo V; Chan E; Tam K; Chau R; Wong KK
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 36(4):631-6. PubMed ID: 20362856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet
McDonald JE; Knollinger AM; Dustin Dees D; MacLaren NE
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious Hermann's tortoises (Testudo hermanni) by means of rebound tonometry.
Selleri P; Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; D'Anna N
Am J Vet Res; 2012 Nov; 73(11):1807-12. PubMed ID: 23106468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse.
Morris CA; Crowston JG; Lindsey JD; Danias J; Weinreb RN
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 82(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16466714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry.
Kim CY; Kuehn MH; Anderson MG; Kwon YH
Eye (Lond); 2007 Sep; 21(9):1202-9. PubMed ID: 16946746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses.
Knollinger AM; La Croix NC; Barrett PM; Miller PE
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2005 Jul; 227(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 16047660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
García-Resúa C; González-Meijome JM; Gilino J; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population.
Fernandes P; Díaz-Rey JA; Queirós A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM; Jorge J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):436-40. PubMed ID: 16101950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (TonoVet) with the applanation tonometer (TonoPen XL) in normal Eurasian Eagle owls (Bubo bubo).
Jeong MB; Kim YJ; Yi NY; Park SA; Kim WT; Kim SE; Chae JM; Kim JT; Lee H; Seo KM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2007; 10(6):376-9. PubMed ID: 17970999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a rebound tonometer with an applanation tonometer in dogs with glaucoma.
Slack JM; Stiles J; Moore GE
Vet Rec; 2012 Oct; 171(15):373. PubMed ID: 22915681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
Görig C; Coenen RT; Stades FC; Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC; Boevé MH
Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements between the Tono-Pen XL® and Perkins® applanation tonometers in dogs and cats.
Andrade SF; Palozzi RJ; Giuffrida R; de Campos RJ; Santos Gde C; Fukui RM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():14-20. PubMed ID: 22050624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
