BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23486504)

  • 21. Twenty-four-hour measurement of IOP in rabbits using rebound tonometer.
    Wang X; Dong J; Wu Q
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 16(6):423-8. PubMed ID: 23279703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure with the rebound tonometer and the applanation tonometer in normal dogs.
    Park YW; Jeong MB; Kim TH; Ahn JS; Ahn JT; Park SA; Kim SE; Seo K
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 May; 14(3):169-73. PubMed ID: 21521440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry.
    Cannizzo SA; Lewbart GA; Westermeyer HD
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 20(6):526-532. PubMed ID: 28247466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro and in vivo comparison of applanation tonometry and rebound tonometry in dogs.
    Nagata N; Yuki M; Hasegawa T
    J Vet Med Sci; 2011 Dec; 73(12):1585-9. PubMed ID: 21804316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rebound tonometry in conscious, conditioned mice avoids the acute and profound effects of anesthesia on intraocular pressure.
    Johnson TV; Fan S; Toris CB
    J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Apr; 24(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 18355131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Technical note: a comparison of central and peripheral intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry.
    Queirós A; González-Méijome JM; Fernandes P; Jorge J; Montés-Micó R; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Sep; 27(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 17718891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer.
    Davies LN; Bartlett H; Mallen EA; Wolffsohn JS
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 16637838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. COMPARISON OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE MEASUREMENT USING REBOUND AND APPLANATION TONOMETRY IN LOGGERHEAD (
    Lamagna B; Affuso A; Micieli F; Mennonna G; Meomartino L; Valle GD; Ciampa M; Treglia G; Hochscheid S
    J Zoo Wildl Med; 2021 Jun; 52(2):604-609. PubMed ID: 34130403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the Perkins handheld applanation tonometer in the measurement of intraocular pressure in dogs and cats.
    Andrade SF; Cremonezi T; Zachi CA; Lonchiati CF; Amatuzzi JD; Sakamoto KP; Mello PA
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2009; 12(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 19751486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in horses.
    Miller PE; Pickett JP; Majors LJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1990 Jun; 51(6):935-7. PubMed ID: 2368953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude using dynamic contour tonometry and contact lens tonometry.
    Hoffmann EM; Grus FH; Pfeiffer N
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 4():4. PubMed ID: 15038831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.
    Gandhi NG; Prakalapakorn SG; El-Dairi MA; Jones SK; Freedman SF
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):843-849.e1. PubMed ID: 22840485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Saenz-Frances F; Vizzeri G; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19142135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Repeatability and agreement of intraocular pressure measurement among three tonometers.
    Sánchez Pavón I; Cañadas P; Martin R
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Nov; 103(6):808-812. PubMed ID: 31943335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in dogs using two different tonometers and plano therapeutic soft contact lenses.
    Ahn JT; Jeong MB; Park YW; Kim SE; Ahn JS; Lee YR; Lee ER; Seo K
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 15 Suppl 1():83-8. PubMed ID: 22192568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Noninvasive measurement of rodent intraocular pressure with a rebound tonometer.
    Wang WH; Millar JC; Pang IH; Wax MB; Clark AF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4617-21. PubMed ID: 16303957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The evaluation of tonometry and self-tonometry with Ocuton tonometers.
    Kóthy P; Nagymihály A; Holló G
    Med Sci Monit; 2003 Jan; 9(1):PI1-4. PubMed ID: 12552251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurement of Intraocular Pressure by Patients With Glaucoma.
    Pronin S; Brown L; Megaw R; Tatham AJ
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 135(10):1030-1036. PubMed ID: 28859192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes].
    Deuter CM; Schlote T; Hahn GA; Bende T; Derse M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Mar; 219(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 11987041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.