286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23486504)
41. Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs.
Priehs DR; Gum GG; Whitley RD; Moore LE
Am J Vet Res; 1990 Oct; 51(10):1547-50. PubMed ID: 2240775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Rebound tonometry in children: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
Lambert SR; Melia M; Buffenn AN; Chiang MF; Simpson JL; Yang MB
Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):e21-7. PubMed ID: 23395545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Precision and accuracy of the ICare tonometer - Peripheral and central IOP measurements by rebound tonometry.
Muttuvelu DV; Baggesen K; Ehlers N
Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 90(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 20840218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Jimenez-Santos M; Saenz-Frances F; Matilla-Rodero M; Mendez-Hernandez C; Herrero-Vanrell R; Garcia-Feijoo J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 89(7):676-80. PubMed ID: 19900196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Intraocular pressure in captive black-footed penguins (Spheniscus demevsus) measured by rebound tonometry.
Mercado JA; Wirtu G; Beaufrère H; Lydick D
J Avian Med Surg; 2010 Jun; 24(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 20806659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Measurement of intraocular pressure in healthy unanesthetized inland bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps).
Schuster EJ; Strueve J; Fehr MJ; Mathes KA
Am J Vet Res; 2015 Jun; 76(6):494-9. PubMed ID: 26000596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].
Schlote T; Landenberger H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2005 Feb; 222(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 15719316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors.
Sandhu SS; Chattopadhyay S; Amariotakis GA; Skarmoutsos F; Birch MK; Ray-Chaudhuri N
Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].
Meyer MW; Yevelenko V; Hoy L; Meyer A; Erb C
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Nov; 223(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 17131250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the ocular response analyzer.
Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jul; 35(7):587-96. PubMed ID: 20597645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The Proview phosphene tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice.
Alvarez TL; Gollance SA; Thomas GA; Greene RJ; Marchetto PM; Moore EJ; Realini T; Liebmann JM; Ritch R; Lama P; Fechtner RD
Ophthalmology; 2004 Jun; 111(6):1077-85. PubMed ID: 15177956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Pakrou N; Gray T; Mills R; Landers J; Craig J
J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18303384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of lateral decubitus position on intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients with asymmetric visual field loss.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Lee DS; Kim DM
Ophthalmology; 2013 Apr; 120(4):731-5. PubMed ID: 23260257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of intraocular pressures estimated by rebound and applanation tonometry in dogs with lens instability: 66 cases (2012-2018).
Schlesener BN; Leonard BC; Miller PE; Kass PH; Hollingsworth SR; Cooper AE; Maggs DJ
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2021 Nov; 259(9):1025-1031. PubMed ID: 34647480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Clinical evaluation of the IOPen® in a glaucomatous population.
Jorge J; Fernandes P; Queirós A; Ribeiro P; Ferreira A; Gonzalez-Meijome JM
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Nov; 30(6):860-4. PubMed ID: 21205273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients.
dos Santos MG; Makk S; Berghold A; Eckhardt M; Haas A
Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
