These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23486527)

  • 1. Resource allocation and prioritization in auditory working memory.
    Kumar S; Joseph S; Pearson B; Teki S; Fox ZV; Griffiths TD; Husain M
    Cogn Neurosci; 2013; 4(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 23486527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision of working memory for speech sounds.
    Joseph S; Iverson P; Manohar S; Fox Z; Scott SK; Husain M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2022-40. PubMed ID: 25607721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effect of modality specific interference on working memory in recalling aversive auditory and visual memories
    Matthijssen SJMA; van Schie K; van den Hout MA
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 30465479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A mechanistic insight into sources of error of visual working memory in multiple sclerosis.
    Motahharynia A; Pourmohammadi A; Adibi A; Shaygannejad V; Ashtari F; Adibi I; Sanayei M
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37937840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resource allocation models of auditory working memory.
    Joseph S; Teki S; Kumar S; Husain M; Griffiths TD
    Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 1640(Pt B):183-92. PubMed ID: 26835560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brain activity is related to individual differences in the number of items stored in auditory short-term memory for pitch: evidence from magnetoencephalography.
    Grimault S; Nolden S; Lefebvre C; Vachon F; Hyde K; Peretz I; Zatorre R; Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 94():96-106. PubMed ID: 24642285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Benefits of flexible prioritization in working memory can arise without costs.
    Myers NE; Chekroud SR; Stokes MG; Nobre AC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Mar; 44(3):398-411. PubMed ID: 28816476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlative comparison of visual working memory paradigms and associated models.
    Hojjati F; Motahharynia A; Adibi A; Adibi I; Sanayei M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):20852. PubMed ID: 39242827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unimodal and Bimodal Access to Sensory Working Memories by Auditory and Visual Impulses.
    Wolff MJ; Kandemir G; Stokes MG; Akyürek EG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(3):671-681. PubMed ID: 31754009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Not fully remembered, but not forgotten: interfering sounds worsen but do not eliminate the representation of pitch in working memory.
    Tollefsrud MA; Joyner CN; Zakrzewski AC; Wisniewski MG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):855-865. PubMed ID: 38231462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top-Down Modulation of Auditory-Motor Integration during Speech Production: The Role of Working Memory.
    Guo Z; Wu X; Li W; Jones JA; Yan N; Sheft S; Liu P; Liu H
    J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(43):10323-10333. PubMed ID: 28951450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. New perspectives on binding in visual working memory.
    Schneegans S; Bays PM
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):207-244. PubMed ID: 30295318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Working memory for pitch, timbre, and words.
    Schulze K; Tillmann B
    Memory; 2013 Apr; 21(3):377-95. PubMed ID: 23116413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient Coding in Visual Working Memory Accounts for Stimulus-Specific Variations in Recall.
    Taylor R; Bays PM
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(32):7132-7142. PubMed ID: 30006363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distinct prioritization of visual working memory representations for search and for recall.
    Dube B; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1253-1261. PubMed ID: 30644056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural Correlates Underlying the Precision of Visual Working Memory.
    Zhao Y; Kuai S; Zanto TP; Ku Y
    Neuroscience; 2020 Jan; 425():301-311. PubMed ID: 31812661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The short- and long-term fates of memory items retained outside the focus of attention.
    LaRocque JJ; Eichenbaum AS; Starrett MJ; Rose NS; Emrich SM; Postle BR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):453-68. PubMed ID: 25472902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():20-31. PubMed ID: 25557544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is working memory storage intrinsically domain-specific?
    Uittenhove K; Chaabi L; Camos V; Barrouillet P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Nov; 148(11):2027-2057. PubMed ID: 30829525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial transposition gradients in visual working memory.
    Rerko L; Oberauer K; Lin HY
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 23663175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.