These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23486908)

  • 41. Miranda Warning Comprehension: The Influence of Verbal Aptitude and Hearing Status.
    Silvasi PM; Bell D; Contreras J; Rothman-Marshall SFAG; Ernest JL; Edlund JE
    Psychol Rep; 2023 Feb; 126(1):361-379. PubMed ID: 35125030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Knowing and intelligent: a study of Miranda warnings in mentally disordered defendants.
    Rogers R; Harrison KS; Hazelwood LL; Sewell KW
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Aug; 31(4):401-18. PubMed ID: 17245635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Taking the next step in Miranda evaluations: Considering racial trauma and the impact of prior police contact.
    Kavanaugh A; Pietruszka V; Rynczak D; Blanding D
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):249-259. PubMed ID: 36931861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Lateralization of temporal lobe epilepsy and learning disabilities, as defined by disability-related civil rights law.
    Butterbaugh G; Olejniczak P; Roques B; Costa R; Rose M; Fisch B; Carey M; Thomson J; Skinner J
    Epilepsia; 2004 Aug; 45(8):963-70. PubMed ID: 15270764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. You have the right to understand: the deleterious effect of stress on suspects' ability to comprehend Miranda.
    Scherr KC; Madon S
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 22849413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Confessions--their reliability.
    Simpson R
    Med Leg J; 1988; 56 ( Pt 3)():125-39. PubMed ID: 3193915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Why people waive their Miranda rights: the power of innocence.
    Kassin SM; Norwick RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Apr; 28(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 15141779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Falling through the cracks: Failing to identify compromised Miranda abilities for defendants with limited cognitive capacities.
    Tazi KY; Rogers R
    Behav Sci Law; 2023; 41(5):326-342. PubMed ID: 36866414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Getting it wrong about Miranda rights: false beliefs, impaired reasoning, and professional neglect.
    Rogers R
    Am Psychol; 2011 Nov; 66(8):728-36. PubMed ID: 22082397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: potential problems and issues.
    Hurley KE; Deal WP
    Ment Retard; 2006 Apr; 44(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 16689611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Clinical myths of forensic neuropsychology.
    Greiffenstein MF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 18609338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Saudi normative data for the Wisconsin Card Sorting test, Stroop test, Test of Non-verbal Intelligence-3, Picture Completion and Vocabulary (subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised).
    Al-Ghatani AM; Obonsawin MC; Binshaig BA; Al-Moutaery KR
    Neurosciences (Riyadh); 2011 Jan; 16(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 21206442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The utility of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
    Weiss RA; Rosenfeld B; Farkas MR
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 21561992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: an assessment tool for clinical research subjects.
    Miller CK; O'Donnell DC; Searight HR; Barbarash RA
    Pharmacotherapy; 1996; 16(5):872-8. PubMed ID: 8888082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comprehending Canadian police cautions: are the rights to silence and legal counsel understandable?
    Eastwood J; Snook B
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):366-77. PubMed ID: 19882632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is the Rey 15-Item Memory Test II (Rey II) a valid symptom validity test?: comparison with the TOMM.
    Whitney KA; Hook JN; Steiner AR; Shepard PH; Callaway S
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2008; 15(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 19023746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Commentary: ethics-related implications and neurobiological correlates of false confessions in juveniles.
    Weinstock R; Thompson C
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19767499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Competence to waive interrogation rights and adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: cognitive development, attorney contact, and psychological symptoms.
    Viljoen JL; Roesch R
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):723-42. PubMed ID: 16382358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The meaning of malingering data: further applications of Bayes' theorem.
    Mossman D
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):761-79. PubMed ID: 11180421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.