These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23487016)

  • 1. An Overview on Coronary Heart Disease (A Comparative Evaluation of Turkey and Europe) and Cost-effectiveness of Diagnostic Strategies.
    Taşçı C; Ozçelik N
    Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2011 Dec; 20(3):75-93. PubMed ID: 23487016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Anatomic vs Functional Index Testing in Patients With Low-Risk Stable Chest Pain.
    Karády J; Mayrhofer T; Ivanov A; Foldyna B; Lu MT; Ferencik M; Pursnani A; Salerno M; Udelson JE; Mark DB; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Dec; 3(12):e2028312. PubMed ID: 33315111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(16):1-167. PubMed ID: 23074467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Danish study of Non-Invasive testing in Coronary Artery Disease (Dan-NICAD): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Nissen L; Winther S; Isaksen C; Ejlersen JA; Brix L; Urbonaviciene G; Frost L; Madsen LH; Knudsen LL; Schmidt SE; Holm NR; Maeng M; Nyegaard M; Bøtker HE; Bøttcher M
    Trials; 2016 May; 17(1):262. PubMed ID: 27225018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT coronary angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography in CHD.
    Gorenoi V; Schönermark MP; Hagen A
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2012; 8():Doc02. PubMed ID: 22536300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(15):1-45. PubMed ID: 23074392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Care Guided by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy, or NICE Guidelines on Subsequent Unnecessary Angiography Rates: The CE-MARC 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Greenwood JP; Ripley DP; Berry C; McCann GP; Plein S; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Dall'Armellina E; Prasad A; Bijsterveld P; Foley JR; Mangion K; Sculpher M; Walker S; Everett CC; Cairns DA; Sharples LD; Brown JM;
    JAMA; 2016 Sep; 316(10):1051-60. PubMed ID: 27570866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(16):1-80. PubMed ID: 23074393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with ischaemic heart disease: A report from the cardiovascular committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Endorsed by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.
    Trägårdh E; Tan SS; Bucerius J; Gimelli A; Gaemperli O; Lindner O; Agostini D; Übleis C; Sciagrà R; Slart RH; Underwood SR; Hyafil F; Hacker M; Verberne HJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 18(8):825-832. PubMed ID: 28549119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of medical and health economic effectiveness of non-pharmacological secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
    Müller-Riemenschneider F; Damm K; Meinhard C; Bockelbrink A; Vauth C; Willich SN; Greiner W
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2009 Dec; 5():Doc16. PubMed ID: 21289903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A systematic review and economic evaluation of new-generation computed tomography scanners for imaging in coronary artery disease and congenital heart disease: Somatom Definition Flash, Aquilion ONE, Brilliance iCT and Discovery CT750 HD.
    Westwood M; Al M; Burgers L; Redekop K; Lhachimi S; Armstrong N; Raatz H; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2013; 17(9):1-243. PubMed ID: 23463937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(8):1-64. PubMed ID: 23074411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rationale and design of the Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization: Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes, Cost Effectiveness and Quality of Life (CONSERVE) trial.
    Lee SE; Lin FY; Lu Y; Chang HJ; Min JK
    Am Heart J; 2017 Apr; 186():48-55. PubMed ID: 28454832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic review of the prognostic effectiveness of SPECT myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and following myocardial infarction.
    Mowatt G; Brazzelli M; Gemmell H; Hillis GS; Metcalfe M; Vale L;
    Nucl Med Commun; 2005 Mar; 26(3):217-29. PubMed ID: 15722902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(12):1-38. PubMed ID: 23074389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomography versus invasive coronary angiography: design and methods of the pragmatic randomised multicentre DISCHARGE trial.
    Napp AE; Haase R; Laule M; Schuetz GM; Rief M; Dreger H; Feuchtner G; Friedrich G; Špaček M; Suchánek V; Fuglsang Kofoed K; Engstroem T; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Gutberlet M; Woinke M; Maurovich-Horvat P; Merkely B; Donnelly P; Ball P; Dodd JD; Quinn M; Saba L; Porcu M; Francone M; Mancone M; Erglis A; Zvaigzne L; Jankauskas A; Sakalyte G; Harań T; Ilnicka-Suckiel M; Bettencourt N; Gama-Ribeiro V; Condrea S; Benedek I; Čemerlić Adjić N; Adjić O; Rodriguez-Palomares J; Garcia Del Blanco B; Roditi G; Berry C; Davis G; Thwaite E; Knuuti J; Pietilä M; Kępka C; Kruk M; Vidakovic R; Neskovic AN; Díez I; Lecumberri I; Geleijns J; Kubiak C; Strenge-Hesse A; Do TH; Frömel F; Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I; Benguria-Arrate G; Keiding H; Katzer C; Müller-Nordhorn J; Rieckmann N; Walther M; Schlattmann P; Dewey M;
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2957-2968. PubMed ID: 27864607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic Value of Combined CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging versus Invasive Coronary Angiography and Nuclear Stress Perfusion Imaging in the Prediction of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: The CORE320 Multicenter Study.
    Chen MY; Rochitte CE; Arbab-Zadeh A; Dewey M; George RT; Miller JM; Niinuma H; Yoshioka K; Kitagawa K; Sakuma H; Laham R; Vavere AL; Cerci RJ; Mehra VC; Nomura C; Kofoed KF; Jinzaki M; Kuribayashi S; Scholte AJ; Laule M; Tan SY; Hoe J; Paul N; Rybicki FJ; Brinker JA; Arai AE; Matheson MB; Cox C; Clouse ME; Di Carli MF; Lima JAC
    Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 28290782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economics of myocardial perfusion imaging in Europe--the EMPIRE Study.
    Underwood SR; Godman B; Salyani S; Ogle JR; Ell PJ
    Eur Heart J; 1999 Jan; 20(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 10099913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.