These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2348713)

  • 1. Dual energy radiography using X-ray films and intensifying screens.
    Zananiri FA; Speller RD
    J Biomed Eng; 1990 May; 12(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 2348713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Active energy selective image detector for dual-energy computed radiography.
    Alvarez RE
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1739-48. PubMed ID: 8946370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [RSNA 2004: does dual energy subtraction radiography method using flat panel detector improve the diagnostic accuracy of interstitial lung diseases?].
    Kiguchi M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Aug; 61(8):1116-7. PubMed ID: 16132028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of dual energy detector system performance.
    Alvarez RE; Seibert JA; Thompson SK
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):556-65. PubMed ID: 15070254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors.
    Richard S; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1397-413. PubMed ID: 15984691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Absolute speeds of screen-film systems and their absorbed-energy constants.
    Kodera Y; Doi K; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 6701320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Monte Carlo study of x-ray fluorescence in x-ray detectors.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA; Sabol JM; Tecotzky M
    Med Phys; 1999 Jun; 26(6):905-16. PubMed ID: 10436891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intensifying effect of metallic screens on the sensitivity of x-ray films for 400-kV bremsstrahlung photons.
    Navon E; Dick CE; Barnea G
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 2046618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Energy and angular dependence of x-ray absorption and its effect on radiographic response in screen--film systems.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 May; 28(5):565-79. PubMed ID: 6867113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximizing film contrast for scanning equalization radiography.
    Plewes DB; McFaul J; Ivanovic M
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 2385192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binary screen detector system for single-pulse dual-energy radiography.
    Boone JM; Tecotzky M; Alexander GM
    Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):863-70. PubMed ID: 1584948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detector for dual-energy digital radiography.
    Barnes GT; Sones RA; Tesic MM; Morgan DR; Sanders JN
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):537-40. PubMed ID: 4011921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Light production from intensifying screens (theoretical and experimental aspects)].
    Giacomich R; Tomasini F; Bacarini L; Di Lelio A
    Radiol Med; 1982; 68(7-8):571-80. PubMed ID: 7134508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitometric effects of varying the intensifying screens used with Agfa Dentus ST8G and RP6 panoramic radiographic films.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kitagawa H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 9442613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The selection of films and intensifying screens for use as a two-dimensional detector in a computed tomography system.
    Truscott JG; Westmacott CF; Bentley HB; Horsman A
    Radiogr Today; 1988 Nov; 54(618):31-4. PubMed ID: 3269738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The importance of spectral separation: an assessment of dual-energy spectral separation for quantitative ability and dose efficiency.
    Krauss B; Grant KL; Schmidt BT; Flohr TG
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 25373305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exact dual energy material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR).
    Maass C; Meyer E; Kachelriess M
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 21452706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.