These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [On meeting sanitary legal requirements in technical regulation of medical equipment safety]. Kravchenko OK; Prokopenko LV Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2007; (7):21-7. PubMed ID: 17802737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Guidelines on product liability for the hospital blood bank. The British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Clin Lab Haematol; 1990; 12(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 2272161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Manufacturers' liability for drugs and medical devices under the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability. Dreier WA Seton Hall Law Rev; 1999; 30(1):258-64. PubMed ID: 10848105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing technology in health: product liability. Kelly JG Collegian; 1998 Apr; 5(2):24-9. PubMed ID: 9644337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can Missouri health care providers be held liable under strict product liability law? Cole CH Mo Med; 1995 Sep; 92(9):581-3. PubMed ID: 7476832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Premarket approval and federal preemption of product liability claims in the wake of Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Jarcho DG Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 11797730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perspectives. Battle heats up over product liability reform. Miller D Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1995 Apr; 49(17):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10141116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Civil liability in the field of biomedical engineering and medical physics. Deutsch E; Fischer G Med Prog Technol; 1982; 9(2-3):177-80. PubMed ID: 7162489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Safe Medical Device Act: nursing implications. Singleton KA; Dever R; Donner TA Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1992; 11(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 1597102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical device preemption after Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr. Neraas MB Food Drug Law J; 1996; 51(4):619-29. PubMed ID: 11797731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical devices; preemption of state product liability claims--FDA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1997 Dec; 62(239):65384-8. PubMed ID: 10176832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effective use of physics services in the NHS. Elliot AT; Crippin DD; Dick TD; Sharp PF Health Serv Manage; 1988 Jun; 84(3):38-41. PubMed ID: 10287900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decontamination and the law. A better understanding. Hewitson P Br J Perioper Nurs; 2000 Aug; 10(8):405-11. PubMed ID: 11261005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Legally speaking. Who's to blame for faulty equipment? Tammelleo AD RN; 1990 Oct; 53(10):67-72. PubMed ID: 2218328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Compared to what? Instructing the jury on product defect under the Products Liability Act and the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability. Conk GW Seton Hall Law Rev; 1999; 30(1):273-303. PubMed ID: 10848107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Product liability in the medical laboratory. Doughty RW Med Lab Sci; 1989 Jan; 46(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 2779385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]