170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23488157)
1. [Effectiveness assessment of 3-D cone beam CT used in human bite marks identification].
Wu Y; Chen X; Shen Y; Yu J; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Xu Y
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 30(1):157-61, 190. PubMed ID: 23488157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of comparison overlays generated with DentalPrint software in bite mark analysis.
Martin-de las Heras S; Valenzuela A; Javier Valverde A; Torres JC; Luna-del-Castillo JD
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):151-6. PubMed ID: 17209928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.
Kouble RF; Craig GT
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 14979355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of Intercanine Distance and Dimensional Changes in Bite Marks on Foodstuffs Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Ali IK; Sansare K; Karjodkar FR
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2018 Sep; 39(3):213-217. PubMed ID: 29652674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology.
van der Velden A; Spiessens M; Willems G
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16783951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of bite marks in foodstuffs by computer tomography (cone beam CT)--3D reconstruction.
Marques J; Musse J; Caetano C; Corte-Real F; Corte-Real AT
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2013 Dec; 31(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 24776435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of simulated human dermal bitemarks possessing three-dimensional attributes to suspected biters using a proprietary three-dimensional comparison.
Martin-de-las-Heras S; Tafur D
Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Sep; 190(1-3):33-7. PubMed ID: 19505780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition.
Sweet D; Bowers CM
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):362-7. PubMed ID: 9544542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study between xerographic, computer-assisted overlay generation and animated-superimposition methods in bite mark analyses.
Tai MW; Chong ZF; Asif MK; Rahmat RA; Nambiar P
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Sep; 22():42-8. PubMed ID: 27591538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods].
Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Glapiński M; Zaba C; Łabecka M
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 22390125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3-D imaging and quantitative comparison of human dentitions and simulated bite marks.
Blackwell SA; Taylor RV; Gordon I; Ogleby CL; Tanijiri T; Yoshino M; Donald MR; Clement JG
Int J Legal Med; 2007 Jan; 121(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 16391946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional imaging of human cutaneous forearm bite marks in human volunteers over a 4 day period.
de Sainte Croix MM; Gauld D; Forgie AH; Lowe R
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 May; 40():34-9. PubMed ID: 27010493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays.
Sweet D; Parhar M; Wood RE
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1050-5. PubMed ID: 9729824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analysis of bite marks].
Spiessens M; Van der Velden B; Willems G
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 16370436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 2; "SCIP" and bite marks in skin and foodstuffs.
Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 9227071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a bitemark using clear acrylic replicas of the suspect's dentition--a case report.
McKenna CJ; Haron MI; Taylor JA
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1999 Dec; 17(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 10709562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A framework for estimating probability of a match in forensic bite mark identification.
Tuceryan M; Li F; Blitzer HL; Parks ET; Platt JA
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S83-9. PubMed ID: 20887354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model.
Avon SL; Victor C; Mayhall JT; Wood RE
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 20457498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-based production of comparison overlays from 3D-scanned dental casts for bite mark analysis.
Martin-de las Heras S; Valenzuela A; Ogayar C; Valverde AJ; Torres JC
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jan; 50(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 15831006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application Status and Prospect of Bite Mark Evidence in Forensic Odontology.
Ma XF; Jin M; Sun H; Mi CB
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 36(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 32705852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
