These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23488304)

  • 1. Sonoelastography of the uterine cervix as a new diagnostic tool of cervical assessment in pregnant women - preliminary report.
    Fuchs T; Woytoń R; Pomorski M; Wiatrowski A; Slejman N; Tomiałowicz M; Florjański J; Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk E; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 23488304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
    Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical Strain Elastography in Pregnancy and Association with Maternal Factors.
    Meyberg-Solomayer G; Gerlinger C; Hamza A; Schlaegel F; Takacs Z; Solomayer EF
    Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):71-77. PubMed ID: 25734411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of strain elastography using in vivo compression in the assessment of the uterine cervix during pregnancy.
    Kwak DW; Kim M; Oh SY; Park HS; Kim SJ; Kim MY; Hwang HS
    J Perinat Med; 2020 Mar; 48(3):256-265. PubMed ID: 32083451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overview of the methods available for biomechanical testing of the uterine cervix in vivo.
    Hee L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Dec; 93(12):1219-37. PubMed ID: 25174701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative strain elastography of the uterine cervix assessed by the GE Voluson E10 system in combination with a force-measuring device.
    Rohr Thomsen C; Leonhard AK; Strandbo Schmidt Jensen M; Bor P; Hinge M; Uldbjerg N; Sandager P
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(1):2213797. PubMed ID: 37202178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Addition of Cervical Elastography May Increase Preterm Delivery Prediction Performance in Pregnant Women with Short Cervix: a Prospective Study.
    Park HS; Kwon H; Kwak DW; Kim MY; Seol HJ; Hong JS; Shim JY; Choi SK; Hwang HS; Oh MJ; Cho GJ; Kim K; Oh SY;
    J Korean Med Sci; 2019 Mar; 34(9):e68. PubMed ID: 30863266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the cervix in pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency during the first trimester using elastography.
    Chen CY; Chen CP; Sun FJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1497-1503. PubMed ID: 32564364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic value of elastography in predicting premature delivery.
    Swiatkowska-Freund M; Traczyk-Łoś A; Preis K; Łukaszuk M; Zielińska K
    Ginekol Pol; 2014 Mar; 85(3):204-7. PubMed ID: 24783432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Londero AP; Schmitz R; Bertozzi S; Driul L; Fruscalzo A
    J Perinat Med; 2016 Mar; 44(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 26011923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix by interposition of a synthetic reference material.
    Hee L; Sandager P; Petersen O; Uldbjerg N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1244-9. PubMed ID: 24032689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and inter-observer variability of evaluation of uterine cervix elastography images during pregnancy.
    Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z; Preis K
    Ginekol Pol; 2014 May; 85(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 25011217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.
    Fruscalzo A; Mazza E; Feltovich H; Schmitz R
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Oct; 43(4):493-504. PubMed ID: 27259500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time.
    Hee L; Rasmussen CK; Schlütter JM; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 24702544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging analysis of cervical elastography for prediction of successful induction of labor at term.
    Hwang HS; Sohn IS; Kwon HS
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jun; 32(6):937-46. PubMed ID: 23716514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between endocervical canal length between 15-24 weeks gestation and obstetric history.
    Guzman ER; Mellon R; Vintzileos AM; Ananth CV; Walters C; Gipson K
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1998; 7(6):269-72. PubMed ID: 9848691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Translabial ultrasound of the third-trimester uterine cervix. Correlation with digital examination.
    Mahony BS; Nyberg DA; Luthy DA; Hirsch JH; Hickok DE; Petty CN
    J Ultrasound Med; 1990 Dec; 9(12):717-23. PubMed ID: 2277401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative cervical elastography: a new approach of cervical insufficiency prediction.
    Zhang L; Zheng Q; Xie H; Du L; Wu L; Lin M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Jan; 301(1):207-215. PubMed ID: 31758303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Vivo Measurement of Cervical Elasticity on Pregnant Women by Torsional Wave Technique: A Preliminary Study.
    Massó P; Callejas A; Melchor J; Molina FS; Rus G
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jul; 19(15):. PubMed ID: 31344796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Elastography in the examination of the uterine cervix before labor induction].
    Preis K; Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 21117304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.