BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23488554)

  • 1. The overuse of cesarean delivery.
    Lowe NK
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2013; 42(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 23488554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate.
    Sachs BP; Kobelin C; Castro MA; Frigoletto F
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Jan; 340(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 9878648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth. The Cesarean Birth Task Force.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Apr; 57(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 7243111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A discussion of medical malpractice and cesarean section.
    Berkman H
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1993 Apr; (170):9-30. PubMed ID: 10125422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Women's autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale.
    Potter JE; Hopkins K; Faúndes A; Perpétuo I
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physician bias in cesarean sections.
    Phillips RN; Thornton J; Gleicher N
    JAMA; 1982 Sep; 248(9):1082-4. PubMed ID: 7109201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Too many Caesareans?
    Clark M; Lord M
    Newsweek; 1980 Oct; 96(14):105. PubMed ID: 10248283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is repeated caesarean section a consequence of elective caesarean section?
    Murta EF; Nomelini RS
    Lancet; 2004 Aug 21-27; 364(9435):649-50. PubMed ID: 15325816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overuse in obstetrics.
    Simpson KR
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2013 Mar; 38(2):128. PubMed ID: 23426059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Are so man cesarean sections necessary? (interview by Dr. Thomas Meissner)].
    Schneider KT
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 May; 148(20):17. PubMed ID: 16805184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates.
    Stafford RS
    JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(5):683-7. PubMed ID: 2296123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeat cesarean section and primary elective cesarean section: recently trained obstetrician-gynecologist practice patterns and opinions.
    Kenton K; Brincat C; Mutone M; Brubaker L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 192(6):1872-5; discussion 1875-6. PubMed ID: 15970836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The demise of vaginal operative obstetrics: a suggested plan for its revival.
    Seiler JS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):710-3. PubMed ID: 2314791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caesarean sections--are rates too high?
    Greenwood J
    Midwife Health Visit Community Nurse; 1983 Sep; 19(9):367. PubMed ID: 6556438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Disagreement among obstetricians: one cannot squander cesarean sections. Interview by Bjørg Engdahl].
    Børdahl P
    Jordmorbladet; 1997; (7):10-1. PubMed ID: 9392255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Placenta accreta: incidence and risk factors in an area with a particularly high rate of cesarean section.
    Morlando M; Sarno L; Napolitano R; Capone A; Tessitore G; Maruotti GM; Martinelli P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Apr; 92(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 23347183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diversity and clinical science in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Geirsson RT
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 Jul; 89(7):860-1. PubMed ID: 20583930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Potential of geographical variation analysis for realigning providers to value-based care. ECHO case study on lower-value indications of C-section in five European countries.
    García-Armesto S; Angulo-Pueyo E; Martínez-Lizaga N; Mateus C; Joaquim I; Bernal-Delgado E;
    Eur J Public Health; 2015 Feb; 25 Suppl 1():44-51. PubMed ID: 25690129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The epidemics has reached us].
    Villarreal Peral C; Olvera Gracida L
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2005 Aug; 73(8):464-5. PubMed ID: 16304973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.