These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23488554)

  • 21. Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery.
    Baicker K; Buckles KS; Chandra A
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(5):w355-67. PubMed ID: 16895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Women's attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea--a society with high cesarean section rates.
    Lee SI; Khang YH; Lee MS
    Birth; 2004 Jun; 31(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 15153130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Cesarean section from the point of view of the woman's health].
    GASTELUM BJ
    Cir Cir; 1958 Oct; 26(10):487-92; discussion 496-501. PubMed ID: 13608857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Elective cesarean section: why women choose it and what nurses need to know.
    Collard TD; Diallo H; Habinsky A; Hentschell C; Vezeau TM
    Nurs Womens Health; 2008 Dec; 12(6):480-8. PubMed ID: 19121053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Commentary: "health has become secondary to a sexually attractive body".
    Bastian H
    BMJ; 1999 Nov; 319(7222):1402. PubMed ID: 10610166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Commentary on the article "Cesarean section from the point of view of the woman's health".
    RABAGO J
    Cir Cir; 1958 Oct; 26(10):493-5; discussion 496-501. PubMed ID: 13608858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The many ways to sew up a uterus. "Single-layer" vs. "double-layer" cesarean repair: what's best?
    Cohain JS
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (70):32-4. PubMed ID: 15310123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Incidence and correlates of cesarean section in a capital city of a middle-income country.
    Tamim H; El-Chemaly S; Nassar A; Mumtaz G; Kaddour A; Kabakian-Khasholian T; Fakhoury H; Yunis K;
    J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 17542661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital.
    Iglesias S; Burn R; Saunders LD
    CMAJ; 1991 Dec; 145(11):1459-64. PubMed ID: 1959105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Midwives and cesarean sections.
    Weil L
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Jun; 32(6):1171. PubMed ID: 23733992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Caesarean sections on the rise.
    Muraleedharan VR
    Natl Med J India; 2000; 13(1):46. PubMed ID: 10743377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Incidence of amniotic fluid embolism: relation to cesarean section and to age.
    Stein PD; Matta F; Yaekoub AY
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Mar; 18(3):327-9. PubMed ID: 19243272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The trouble with repeat Cesareans.
    Paul P
    Time; 2009 Mar; 173(8):36-7. PubMed ID: 19288874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic.
    Visser GHA; Ayres-de-Campos D; Barnea ER; de Bernis L; Di Renzo GC; Vidarte MFE; Lloyd I; Nassar AH; Nicholson W; Shah PK; Stones W; Sun L; Theron GB; Walani S
    Lancet; 2018 Oct; 392(10155):1286-1287. PubMed ID: 30322563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The myth of micro-data.
    Halvorson GC; Mangen DJ; Cooney KM
    HMO Pract; 1991; 5(5):178-82. PubMed ID: 10114299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.
    Gleicher N
    JAMA; 1984 Dec; 252(23):3273-6. PubMed ID: 6512931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Cesarean section: indications, incidence, perioperative and perinatal morbidity/mortality. Results of a 1982 Swiss pilot study with 41 participating hospitals (Study Group of Swiss Women's Hospitals].
    Hochuli E; Marti WK
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1983; 23 Suppl 4():33-41. PubMed ID: 6674022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified?
    Resnik R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):752-4. PubMed ID: 16582108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of managed care enrollment on primary and repeat cesarean rates among U.S. Department of Defense health care beneficiaries in military and civilian hospitals worldwide, 1999-2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR
    Birth; 2004 Dec; 31(4):254-64. PubMed ID: 15566337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contemporary Issues in Women's Health.
    Geary M; Chibwesha C; Stringer E
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Jul; 146(1):36-38. PubMed ID: 31173357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.