These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23488554)

  • 61. Repeat cesarean section.
    MARR JP; KO JH
    Postgrad Med; 1959 Aug; 26(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 13675018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The problem of the repeat cesarean section; a preliminary study.
    O'CONNOR CT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1947 Jun; 53(6):914-26. PubMed ID: 20247846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Repeated cesarean section; analysis of 133 cases].
    ARAUJO JO; NEME B; MARETTI M
    An Bras Ginecol; 1955 May; 39(5):253-66. PubMed ID: 13238818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Some aspects of repeated cesarean section].
    JUNCEDA AVELLO E
    Rev Esp Obstet Ginecol; 1956; 15(85):27-39. PubMed ID: 13323540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. FIGO Committee for the Ethical Aspects of Human Reproduction and Women's Health. Committee statement to be used when publishing the enclosed ethical guidelines, 1998.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 39(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 10554945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Delivery debate.
    Nurs Stand; 2010 Jul 28-Aug 3; 24(47):28-9. PubMed ID: 20806592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Repeated cesarean sections. Part III].
    PAEZ PUMAR JI; MARCANO GUZMAN H; AGUERO O
    Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez; 1959; 19():719-26. PubMed ID: 14429736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Overuse of administrative data to measure underuse of care.
    Hsu J; Go A; Selby J
    JAMA; 2001 Feb; 285(6):735; discussion 736-7. PubMed ID: 11176905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Overuse of administrative data to measure underuse of care.
    Pogach L
    JAMA; 2001 Feb; 285(6):735-6; author reply 736-7. PubMed ID: 11176906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Overuse of administrative data to measure underuse of care.
    Woolf SH; Rothemich SF
    JAMA; 2001 Feb; 285(6):736-7. PubMed ID: 11176907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [Borning in Brazil, an interview with Maria do Carmo Leal].
    Carvalho MS; Leal MDC; Lima LD
    Cad Saude Publica; 2018 Sep; 34(8):e00105018. PubMed ID: 30208186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Why wildly varying C-section rates persist.
    Whitman E
    Mod Healthc; 2017 Mar; 47(11):17. PubMed ID: 30408395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The 10-Group Classification System-a new way of thinking.
    Robson MS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 219(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 29941276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Reply.
    Hehir MP; Friedman AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):205-206. PubMed ID: 30315789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database.
    Kozhimannil KB; Arcaya MC; Subramanian SV
    PLoS Med; 2014 Oct; 11(10):e1001745. PubMed ID: 25333943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Don't Rush Me . . . Go the Full 40: AWHONN's Public Health Campaign Promotes Spontaneous Labor and Normal Birth to Reduce Overuse of Inductions and Cesareans.
    Bingham D; Ruhl C; Cockey CD
    J Perinat Educ; 2013; 22(4):189-93. PubMed ID: 24868131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The overuse of cesarean delivery.
    Lowe NK
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2013; 42(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 23488554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate.
    Sachs BP; Kobelin C; Castro MA; Frigoletto F
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Jan; 340(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 9878648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. NIH consensus development statement on cesarean childbirth. The Cesarean Birth Task Force.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Apr; 57(4):537-45. PubMed ID: 7243111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.