106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2348893)
21. A plea for international consensus on categorisation of lesions on the boundary between LSIL and HSIL.
Llwellyn H
Cytopathology; 2009 Jun; 20(3):206-7. PubMed ID: 19489987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Clinical and histologic results in repeated questionable cytologic findings of the uterine cervix].
Gitsch E; Ulm R
Gynakol Rundsch; 1983; 23(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 6667900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Pap smears with reactive cellular changes: a prospective study.
Ding DC; Hsu S; Chen SS; Hsu YH
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):938-40. PubMed ID: 17977169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Classification of virus-induced cervix dysplasia in routine cyto-histological diagnosis].
Stegner HE
Gynakologe; 1981 Dec; 14(4):252-3. PubMed ID: 7198607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. ASCUS in postmenopausal women.
Toms C
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(1):68-9. PubMed ID: 11843563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Condylomatous lesions of uterine cervix: a cytological and histopathological study.
Das DK; Luthra UK; Bhatnagar P; Bhambhani S; Singh V; Pant JN; Khan IU
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1987 Oct; 30(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 3507392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A classification of endocervical curettings.
Gore H; Shingleton HM; Austin JM
Gynecol Oncol; 1976 Mar; 4(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 992478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Infrared spectroscopy of human tissue. IV. Detection of dysplastic and neoplastic changes of human cervical tissue via infrared microscopy.
Chiriboga L; Xie P; Yee H; Zarou D; Zakim D; Diem M
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 1998 Feb; 44(1):219-29. PubMed ID: 9551653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Incidence, causes and follow-up of doubtful smear findings (Papanicolaou group III)].
Hofmann R; Barten G; Rohde E; Beust M; Hamann H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1989; 111(23):1549-54. PubMed ID: 2624007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bethesda 2001.
Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2002 Feb; 13(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 11985563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Malignancy associated changes in cervical smears: systematic changes in cytometric features with the grade of dysplasia.
Guillaud M; Doudkine A; Garner D; MacAulay C; Palcic B
Anal Cell Pathol; 1995 Oct; 9(3):191-204. PubMed ID: 8562458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Endocervical cells, pathology of the cervix, and time.
Vollmer RT
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jan; 117(1):166-7. PubMed ID: 11789723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Diagnosis of cervical dysplasias].
Pérez Dettoma J; Santamaría M; Jurado M; Cabezón C; Domínquez J; de la Fuente F; López García G
Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1980 Dec; 24(4):26-9. PubMed ID: 7336009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of cervical disease history on outcomes of women who have a pap diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
Raab SS; Bishop NS; Zaleski MS
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Sep; 74(3):460-4. PubMed ID: 10479510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Statistical findings on cytological diagnosis of cervical carcinoma].
Pavesi M; Pastormerlo M; Salzani P
Minerva Ginecol; 1986 Jun; 38(6):473-4. PubMed ID: 3737005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Epithelial changes in the cervix: cytological and histological correlation.
Slavin G; Hudson EU
Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1981 Apr; 8(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 7261526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Phagocytosis of autologous lymphocytes by cervical preneoplastic and neoplastic cells.
Ghoneum M; Salem F; Allen H; Gill G
Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul; 1988; 7(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 3237234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Epithelial lesions and carcinoma of the uterine cervix (classification, diagnosis and therapeutic approach)].
Zavadil M; Jirásek A; Motlík K; Rob L; Bauer J; Güttner V
Cesk Patol; 1988 Mar; 24(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 3359515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Evaluation of the agreement between cytological and histological examinations in the diagnosis of cervical cancer].
Kujawska E; Waszyński E
Wiad Lek; 1981 Aug; 34(15):1263-6. PubMed ID: 7331327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
