These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23490006)

  • 1. Biofilm inhibitory and eradicating activity of wound care products against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in an in vitro chronic wound model.
    Brackman G; De Meyer L; Nelis HJ; Coenye T
    J Appl Microbiol; 2013 Jun; 114(6):1833-42. PubMed ID: 23490006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo.
    Fitzgerald DJ; Renick PJ; Forrest EC; Tetens SP; Earnest DN; McMillan J; Kiedaisch BM; Shi L; Roche ED
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Jan; 25(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27859922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of desiccation to treat Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-infected wounds.
    Park E; Long SA; Seth AK; Geringer M; Xu W; Chavez-Munoz C; Leung K; Hong SJ; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2016 Mar; 24(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 26519217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bacteriophage therapy for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-infected wounds: a new approach to chronic wound care.
    Seth AK; Geringer MR; Nguyen KT; Agnew SP; Dumanian Z; Galiano RD; Leung KP; Mustoe TA; Hong SJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Feb; 131(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 23357984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of internally validated
    Suleman L; Purcell L; Thomas H; Westgate S
    J Wound Care; 2020 Mar; 29(3):154-161. PubMed ID: 32160088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of
    Lorenz K; Preem L; Sagor K; Putrinš M; Tenson T; Kogermann K
    Mol Pharm; 2023 Feb; 20(2):1230-1246. PubMed ID: 36669095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
    Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staphylococcal biofilms impair wound healing by delaying reepithelialization in a murine cutaneous wound model.
    Schierle CF; De la Garza M; Mustoe TA; Galiano RD
    Wound Repair Regen; 2009; 17(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 19660043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pre-clinical evaluation of silver, iodine and Manuka honey based dressings in a model of traumatic extremity wounds contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus.
    Guthrie HC; Martin KR; Taylor C; Spear AM; Whiting R; Macildowie S; Clasper JC; Watts SA
    Injury; 2014 Aug; 45(8):1171-8. PubMed ID: 24908627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel chronic wound biofilm model sustaining coexistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus suitable for testing of antibiofilm effect of antimicrobial solutions and wound dressings.
    Chen X; Lorenzen J; Xu Y; Jonikaite M; Thaarup IC; Bjarnsholt T; Kirketerp-Møller K; Thomsen TR
    Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Sep; 29(5):820-829. PubMed ID: 34105845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement.
    Crone S; Garde C; Bjarnsholt T; Alhede M
    J Wound Care; 2015 Feb; 24(2):64, 66-9, 72. PubMed ID: 25647434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro activity of the Qoustic Wound Therapy System against planktonic and biofilm bacteria.
    Karau MJ; Piper KE; Steckelberg JM; Kavros SJ; Patel R
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 23(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 20562540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Efficacy of Tetrasodium EDTA on Biofilms.
    Percival SL; Salisbury AM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1057():101-110. PubMed ID: 29280095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel in vitro flat-bed perfusion biofilm model for determining the potential antimicrobial efficacy of topical wound treatments.
    Thorn RM; Greenman J
    J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 107(6):2070-9. PubMed ID: 19548886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antimicrobial activity of a bioelectric dressing using an in vitro wound pathogen colony drip-flow reactor biofilm model.
    Kim H; Izadjoo M
    J Wound Care; 2016 Jul; 25(Sup7):S47-S52. PubMed ID: 29027847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Extracellular DNA Production Vary in Staphylococcal Biofilms Isolated From Infected Implants versus Controls?
    Zatorska B; Groger M; Moser D; Diab-Elschahawi M; Lusignani LS; Presterl E
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 475(8):2105-2113. PubMed ID: 28194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controlled-release iodine foam dressings demonstrate broad-spectrum biofilm management in several in vitro models.
    Salisbury AM; Mullin M; Foulkes L; Chen R; Percival SL
    Int Wound J; 2022 Nov; 19(7):1717-1728. PubMed ID: 35166016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel flow-system to establish experimental biofilms for modelling chronic wound infection and testing the efficacy of wound dressings.
    Duckworth PF; Rowlands RS; Barbour ME; Maddocks SE
    Microbiol Res; 2018 Oct; 215():141-147. PubMed ID: 30172300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [IMPACT OF BIOFILM ON HEALING AND A METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING IT IN THE WOUND].
    Skrlin J
    Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 27220187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and in vitro performance of an antibiofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing.
    Scully R; Hurlow J; Walker M; Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
    J Wound Care; 2018 Sep; 27(9):584-592. PubMed ID: 30204577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.