These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2349062)

  • 1. Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding.
    Reinitz MT
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 May; 47(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 2349062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does attention affect visual feature integration?
    Prinzmetal W; Presti DE; Posner MI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Aug; 12(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 2943864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability of facilitation and inhibition as a function of cue validity and cue-stimulus intervals in the orienting of sustained attention.
    Bahri T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 1):1027-39. PubMed ID: 9172220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Large and rapid improvement in form discrimination accuracy following a location precue.
    Lyon DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Feb; 73(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 2316388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shifting of attentional focus within and about a visual display.
    Eriksen CW; Webb JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Feb; 45(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 2928079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is evidence for late selection due to automatic or attentional processing of stimulus identities?
    Fournier LR; Shorter S
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):991-1003. PubMed ID: 11578060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: implications for memory and visual search.
    Dodd MD; Castel AD; Pratt J
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Oct; 65(7):1126-35. PubMed ID: 14674638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature-based attention elicited by precueing in an orientation discrimination task.
    Huang D; Xue L; Wang M; Hu Q; Bu X; Chen Y
    Vision Res; 2018 Jul; 148():15-25. PubMed ID: 29763696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence for split attentional foci.
    Awh E; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):834-46. PubMed ID: 10811179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attention effects on form discrimination at different eccentricities.
    Cheal ML; Lyon D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Nov; 41(4):719-46. PubMed ID: 2587796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?
    Cheal M; Lyon DR; Hubbard DC
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Nov; 43(4):825-57. PubMed ID: 1775666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attention and nontarget effects in the location-cuing paradigm.
    Chastain G; Cheal M; Lyon D
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):300-9. PubMed ID: 8838172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of pre-cues on voluntary and reflexive saccade generation. I. Anti-cues for pro-saccades.
    Fischer B; Weber H
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Jun; 120(4):403-16. PubMed ID: 9655226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: effects on perceptual quality.
    Downing CJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 May; 14(2):188-202. PubMed ID: 2967876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"?: On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.
    Briand KA; Klein RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):228-41. PubMed ID: 2953853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.
    Arbuthnott KD; Woodward TS
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Mar; 56(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 11901958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting and changing feature priorities in visual short-term memory.
    Kalogeropoulou Z; Jagadeesh AV; Ohl S; Rolfs M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):453-458. PubMed ID: 27325056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.