269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23490726)
1. Early wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis.
Stuiver MM; Djajadiningrat RS; Graafland NM; Vincent AD; Lucas C; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2013 Sep; 64(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 23490726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surgical wound complications after groin dissection in melanoma patients - a historical cohort study and risk factor analysis.
Stuiver MM; Westerduin E; ter Meulen S; Vincent AD; Nieweg OE; Wouters MW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1284-90. PubMed ID: 24612654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer.
Heyns CF; Fleshner N; Sangar V; Schlenker B; Yuvaraja TB; van Poppel H
Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2 Suppl 1):S43-57. PubMed ID: 20691885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fascia lata preservation during inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: rationale and outcome.
Yao K; Zou ZJ; Li ZS; Zhou FJ; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Li YH; Han H
Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):642-7. PubMed ID: 23876593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sartorius transposition during inguinal lymphadenectomy for melanoma.
Bartlett EK; Meise C; Bansal N; Fischer JP; Low DW; Czerniecki BJ; Roses RE; Fraker DL; Kelz RR; Karakousis GC
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 23688786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience.
Bevan-Thomas R; Slaton JW; Pettaway CA
J Urol; 2002 Apr; 167(4):1638-42. PubMed ID: 11912379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Morbidity of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy with saphenous vein preservation for squamous cell penile carcinoma.
Milathianakis C; Bogdanos J; Karamanolakis D
Int J Urol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):776-8. PubMed ID: 16174057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymph node metastasis in intermediate-risk penile squamous cell cancer: a two-centre experience.
Hughes BE; Leijte JA; Kroon BK; Shabbir MA; Swallow TW; Heenan SD; Corbishley CM; van Boven HH; Perry MJ; Watkin NA; Horenblas S
Eur Urol; 2010 Apr; 57(4):688-92. PubMed ID: 19647926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer in an international multicentre cohort.
Gopman JM; Djajadiningrat RS; Baumgarten AS; Espiritu PN; Horenblas S; Zhu Y; Protzel C; Pow-Sang JM; Kim T; Sexton WJ; Poch MA; Spiess PE
BJU Int; 2015 Aug; 116(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 25777366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes.
Koifman L; Hampl D; Koifman N; Vides AJ; Ornellas AA
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2086-92. PubMed ID: 23770135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early mobilization after ilio-inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma does not increase the wound complication rate.
Wevers KP; Poos HP; van Ginkel RJ; van Etten B; Hoekstra HJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Feb; 39(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 22981748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma.
Bouchot O; Rigaud J; Maillet F; Hetet JF; Karam G
Eur Urol; 2004 Jun; 45(6):761-5; discussion 765-6. PubMed ID: 15149749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A contemporary population-based assessment of the rate of lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma.
Thuret R; Sun M; Lughezzani G; Budaus L; Liberman D; Abdollah F; Morgan M; Johal R; Jeldres C; Latour M; Shariat SF; Iborra F; Guiter J; Patard JJ; Perrotte P; Karakiewicz PI
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 20839061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lymph node dissection in patients with malignant melanoma is associated with high risk of morbidity.
Ul-Mulk J; Hölmich LR
Dan Med J; 2012 Jun; 59(6):A4441. PubMed ID: 22677239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modified technique of radical inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: morbidity and outcome.
Yao K; Tu H; Li YH; Qin ZK; Liu ZW; Zhou FJ; Han H
J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):546-52. PubMed ID: 20620415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Update in the surgical principles and therapeutic outcomes of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer.
Ercole CE; Pow-Sang JM; Spiess PE
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 21481617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inguinal lymph node dissection: epidermal vacuum therapy for prevention of wound complications.
Tauber R; Schmid S; Horn T; Thalgott M; Heck M; Haller B; Kübler H; Autenrieth M; Retz M; Gschwend JE; Maurer T
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Mar; 66(3):390-6. PubMed ID: 23107617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database.
Chua KJ; Balraj V; Patel HV; Srivastava A; Doppalapudi SK; Elsamra SE; Jang TL; Singer EA; Ghodoussipour SB
J Am Coll Surg; 2023 Jan; 236(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 36519902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma with high risk for lymph node invasion treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy.
Marconnet L; Rigaud J; Bouchot O
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2227-32. PubMed ID: 20399455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a contemporary series.
Nelson BA; Cookson MS; Smith JA; Chang SS
J Urol; 2004 Aug; 172(2):494-7. PubMed ID: 15247712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
