These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23492919)

  • 21. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
    Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type.
    Buss E; Hodge SE; Calandruccio L; Leibold LJ; Grose JH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 30601213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.
    Summers V; Molis MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech-in-Noise and Quality-of-Life Measures in School-Aged Children With Normal Hearing and With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Griffin AM; Poissant SF; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):887-904. PubMed ID: 30418282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Masked Speech Recognition and Reading Ability in School-Age Children: Is There a Relationship?
    Miller G; Lewis B; Benchek P; Buss E; Calandruccio L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):776-788. PubMed ID: 29507949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessing speech perception in children with hearing loss: what conventional clinical tools may miss.
    Hillock-Dunn A; Taylor C; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e57-60. PubMed ID: 25329371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
    Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Wendt D; Naylor G; Wang Y; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():68-79. PubMed ID: 28622894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Developmental Effects in Masking Release for Speech-in-Speech Perception Due to a Target/Masker Sex Mismatch.
    Leibold LJ; Buss E; Calandruccio L
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):935-945. PubMed ID: 29369288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 59(5):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 27603264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Clear-Speech Benefit for School-Age Children: Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech Recognition.
    Calandruccio L; Porter HL; Leibold LJ; Buss E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Dec; 63(12):4265-4276. PubMed ID: 33151767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical Assessment of Functional Hearing Deficits: Speech-in-Noise Performance.
    Phatak SA; Brungart DS; Zion DJ; Grant KW
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 30134353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Set-size procedures for controlling variations in speech-reception performance with a fluctuating masker.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Iyer N; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2676-89. PubMed ID: 23039460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Lalonde K; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.