These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23492919)

  • 41. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.
    McCreery RW; Miller MK; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 63(10):3525-3538. PubMed ID: 32881629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception.
    Sheft S; Shafiro V; Lorenzi C; McMullen R; Farrell C
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):709-20. PubMed ID: 22790319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of reverberation on speech recognition in stationary and modulated noise by school-aged children and young adults.
    Wróblewski M; Lewis DE; Valente DL; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 22732772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.
    Helfer KS; Poissant SF; Merchant GR
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):603-614. PubMed ID: 31567564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
    Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.
    Nittrouer S; Caldwell-Tarr A; Tarr E; Lowenstein JH; Rice C; Moberly AC
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):513-25. PubMed ID: 23834373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development of the Children's English and Spanish Speech Recognition Test: Psychometric Properties, Feasibility, Reliability, and Normative Data.
    Leibold LJ; Buss E; Miller MK; Cowan T; McCreery RW; Oleson J; Rodriguez B; Calandruccio L
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):860-877. PubMed ID: 38334698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of long-term target and masker talker familiarity in children's speech-in-speech recognition.
    Flaherty MM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1369195. PubMed ID: 38784624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The effect of otitis media with effusion on perceptual masking.
    Hall JW; Grose JH; Buss E; Dev MB; Drake AF; Pillsbury HC
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2003 Oct; 129(10):1056-62. PubMed ID: 14568787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.
    Buss E; Leibold LJ; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):968. PubMed ID: 27586729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Characterizing the Speech Reception Threshold in hearing-impaired listeners in relation to masker type and masker level.
    Rhebergen KS; Pool RE; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 24606285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
    Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Central masking effects on spondee threshold as a function of masker sensation level and masker sound pressure level.
    Martin FN; Digiovanni D
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 422425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.