These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23492919)

  • 61. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Aging and speech-on-speech masking.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 18091104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.
    Cullington HE; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 21178567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Development and preliminary evaluation of a pediatric Spanish-English speech perception task.
    Calandruccio L; Gomez B; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Am J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 23(2):158-72. PubMed ID: 24686915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Bimodal hearing and speech perception with a competing talker.
    Pyschny V; Landwehr M; Hahn M; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1400-15. PubMed ID: 21498577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Benefits of Acoustic Beamforming for Solving the Cocktail Party Problem.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Best V; Swaminathan J
    Trends Hear; 2015 Jun; 19():. PubMed ID: 26126896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH; Trivette CP; Williams DA; Watts KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Pediatric Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Different Types of Background Noise.
    Goldsworthy RL; Markle KL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 62(3):758-767. PubMed ID: 30950727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The influence of voice quality and multi-talker babble noise on sentence processing and recall performance in school children using cochlear implant and/or hearing aids.
    Jonas Brännström K; von Lochow H; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Sahlén B
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2019 Jul; 44(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 30204510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Children's performance in complex listening conditions: effects of hearing loss and digital noise reduction.
    Pittman A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1224-39. PubMed ID: 21330646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Forward and Backward Masking of Consonants in School-Age Children and Adults.
    Porter HL; Spitzer ER; Buss E; Leibold LJ; Grose JH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 61(7):1807-1814. PubMed ID: 29971342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Jensen KK; Bernstein JGW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2113. PubMed ID: 31046298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effects of Target and Masker Fundamental Frequency Contour Depth on School-Age Children's Speech Recognition in a Two-Talker Masker.
    Flaherty MM; Buss E; Libert K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):400-414. PubMed ID: 36580582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.
    Sheikh Rashid M; Dreschler WA; de Laat JAPM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):967-975. PubMed ID: 28936876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.