These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23492964)

  • 1. A minimally invasive monitoring system of cardiac output using aortic flow velocity and peripheral arterial pressure profile.
    Uemura K; Kawada T; Inagaki M; Sugimachi M
    Anesth Analg; 2013 May; 116(5):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 23492964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.
    Mercado P; Maizel J; Beyls C; Titeca-Beauport D; Joris M; Kontar L; Riviere A; Bonef O; Soupison T; Tribouilloy C; de Cagny B; Slama M
    Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurements in the radial and femoral artery in major cardiac surgery patients.
    van Drumpt A; van Bommel J; Hoeks S; Grüne F; Wolvetang T; Bekkers J; Ter Horst M
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28288587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive beat-by-beat monitoring of cardiac power in normal hearts and during acute ventricular dysfunction.
    Rimehaug AE; Skogvoll E; Aadahl P; Lyng O; Nordhaug DO; Løvstakken L; Kirkeby-Garstad I
    Physiol Rep; 2016 Oct; 4(19):. PubMed ID: 27702881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
    Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of three-dimensional color flow Doppler and two-dimensional pulse wave Doppler transthoracic echocardiography for estimating cardiac output after cardiac surgery.
    Hao GW; Liu Y; Ma GG; Hou JY; Zhu DM; Liu L; Zhang Y; Liu H; Zhuang YM; Luo Z; Tu GW; Yang XM; Chen HY
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2019 Apr; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 30944001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
    Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Fot EV; Zakharov VI; Izotova NN; Yudina AS; Dityateva ZA; Gromova YV; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: a method comparison study in patients treated in the intensive care unit after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Greiwe G; Peters V; Hapfelmeier A; Romagnoli S; Kubik M; Saugel B
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):643-648. PubMed ID: 31456071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.
    Critchley LA; Lee A; Ho AM
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Nov; 111(5):1180-92. PubMed ID: 20736431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ability of a New Smartphone Pulse Pressure Variation and Cardiac Output Application to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
    Joosten A; Boudart C; Vincent JL; Vanden Eynden F; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Rinehart J; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 31094781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioperative non-invasive versus semi-invasive cardiac index monitoring in patients with bariatric surgery - a prospective observational study.
    Lorenzen U; Pohlmann M; Hansen J; Klose P; Gruenewald M; Renner J; Elke G
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):196. PubMed ID: 32778047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Authentication of Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Pressure Waveform-Derived Cardiac Output With Transesophageal Echocardiography-Derived Cardiac Output Measurements in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery.
    Maddali MM; Waje ND; Sathiya PM
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 28465122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of agreement and trending ability between transpulmonary thermodilution and calibrated pulse contour and pulse power cardiac output monitoring methods against pulmonary artery thermodilution in anesthetized dogs.
    Kutter AP; Bettschart-Wolfensberger R; Romagnoli N; Bektas RN
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2016 Jul; 26(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 26754858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
    Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of cardiac output variations induced by hemodynamic interventions using multi-beat analysis of arterial waveform: a comparative off-line study with transesophageal Doppler method during non-cardiac surgery.
    Le Gall A; Vallée F; Joachim J; Hong A; Matéo J; Mebazaa A; Gayat E
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Apr; 36(2):501-510. PubMed ID: 33687601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Lin SY; Chou AH; Tsai YF; Chang SW; Yang MW; Ting PC; Chen CY
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):807-815. PubMed ID: 29039063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment during mechanical ventilation.
    Hällsjö Sander C; Hallbäck M; Wallin M; Emtell P; Oldner A; Björne H
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 May; 112(5):824-31. PubMed ID: 24554544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A preliminary study evaluating cardiac output measurement using Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) in anaesthetized dogs.
    Briganti A; Evangelista F; Centonze P; Rizzo A; Bentivegna F; Crovace A; Staffieri F
    BMC Vet Res; 2018 Mar; 14(1):72. PubMed ID: 29510691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.