218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23492964)
1. A minimally invasive monitoring system of cardiac output using aortic flow velocity and peripheral arterial pressure profile.
Uemura K; Kawada T; Inagaki M; Sugimachi M
Anesth Analg; 2013 May; 116(5):1006-1017. PubMed ID: 23492964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient.
Mercado P; Maizel J; Beyls C; Titeca-Beauport D; Joris M; Kontar L; Riviere A; Bonef O; Soupison T; Tribouilloy C; de Cagny B; Slama M
Crit Care; 2017 Jun; 21(1):136. PubMed ID: 28595621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The value of arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurements in the radial and femoral artery in major cardiac surgery patients.
van Drumpt A; van Bommel J; Hoeks S; Grüne F; Wolvetang T; Bekkers J; Ter Horst M
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28288587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive beat-by-beat monitoring of cardiac power in normal hearts and during acute ventricular dysfunction.
Rimehaug AE; Skogvoll E; Aadahl P; Lyng O; Nordhaug DO; Løvstakken L; Kirkeby-Garstad I
Physiol Rep; 2016 Oct; 4(19):. PubMed ID: 27702881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of cardiac output measurements with pulse contour analysis (PulseCO) and Doppler echocardiography during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Missant C; Rex S; Wouters PF
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2008 Mar; 25(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 17996125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of three-dimensional color flow Doppler and two-dimensional pulse wave Doppler transthoracic echocardiography for estimating cardiac output after cardiac surgery.
Hao GW; Liu Y; Ma GG; Hou JY; Zhu DM; Liu L; Zhang Y; Liu H; Zhuang YM; Luo Z; Tu GW; Yang XM; Chen HY
Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2019 Apr; 17(1):5. PubMed ID: 30944001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimated continuous cardiac output based on pulse wave transit time in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.
Smetkin AA; Hussain A; Fot EV; Zakharov VI; Izotova NN; Yudina AS; Dityateva ZA; Gromova YV; Kuzkov VV; Bjertnæs LJ; Kirov MY
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):361-370. PubMed ID: 26951494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac output estimation by multi-beat analysis of the radial arterial blood pressure waveform versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution: a method comparison study in patients treated in the intensive care unit after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Greiwe G; Peters V; Hapfelmeier A; Romagnoli S; Kubik M; Saugel B
J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Aug; 34(4):643-648. PubMed ID: 31456071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.
Critchley LA; Lee A; Ho AM
Anesth Analg; 2010 Nov; 111(5):1180-92. PubMed ID: 20736431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ability of a New Smartphone Pulse Pressure Variation and Cardiac Output Application to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
Joosten A; Boudart C; Vincent JL; Vanden Eynden F; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Rinehart J; Desebbe O
Anesth Analg; 2019 Jun; 128(6):1145-1151. PubMed ID: 31094781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative non-invasive versus semi-invasive cardiac index monitoring in patients with bariatric surgery - a prospective observational study.
Lorenzen U; Pohlmann M; Hansen J; Klose P; Gruenewald M; Renner J; Elke G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Aug; 20(1):196. PubMed ID: 32778047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Authentication of Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Pressure Waveform-Derived Cardiac Output With Transesophageal Echocardiography-Derived Cardiac Output Measurements in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery.
Maddali MM; Waje ND; Sathiya PM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 28465122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of agreement and trending ability between transpulmonary thermodilution and calibrated pulse contour and pulse power cardiac output monitoring methods against pulmonary artery thermodilution in anesthetized dogs.
Kutter AP; Bettschart-Wolfensberger R; Romagnoli N; Bektas RN
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2016 Jul; 26(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 26754858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Ability of esCCO and ECOM Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output During Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver After Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison with the Pulmonary Thermodilution Method.
Thonnerieux M; Alexander B; Binet C; Obadia JF; Bastien O; Desebbe O
Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 25902321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimation of cardiac output variations induced by hemodynamic interventions using multi-beat analysis of arterial waveform: a comparative off-line study with transesophageal Doppler method during non-cardiac surgery.
Le Gall A; Vallée F; Joachim J; Hong A; Matéo J; Mebazaa A; Gayat E
J Clin Monit Comput; 2022 Apr; 36(2):501-510. PubMed ID: 33687601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.
Lin SY; Chou AH; Tsai YF; Chang SW; Yang MW; Ting PC; Chen CY
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):807-815. PubMed ID: 29039063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel continuous capnodynamic method for cardiac output assessment during mechanical ventilation.
Hällsjö Sander C; Hallbäck M; Wallin M; Emtell P; Oldner A; Björne H
Br J Anaesth; 2014 May; 112(5):824-31. PubMed ID: 24554544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A preliminary study evaluating cardiac output measurement using Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) in anaesthetized dogs.
Briganti A; Evangelista F; Centonze P; Rizzo A; Bentivegna F; Crovace A; Staffieri F
BMC Vet Res; 2018 Mar; 14(1):72. PubMed ID: 29510691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
