These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23493025)

  • 1. SEER and NAACCR data completeness methods: how do they impact data quality in Central Cancer Registries?
    Hwang LJ; Altekruse S; Adamo M; Sun L
    J Registry Manag; 2012; 39(4):185-6. PubMed ID: 23493025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Case completeness and data accuracy in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries.
    Thoburn KK; German RR; Lewis M; Nichols PJ; Ahmed F; Jackson-Thompson J
    Cancer; 2007 Apr; 109(8):1607-16. PubMed ID: 17343277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Frequency and determinants of missing data in clinical and prognostic variables recently added to SEER.
    Kim HM; Goodman M; Kim BI; Ward KC
    J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(3):120-31. PubMed ID: 22223054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and use of the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries standards for cancer registries.
    Seiffert JE
    Top Health Inf Manage; 1997 Feb; 17(3):35-44. PubMed ID: 10165386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment.
    Edwards BK; Brown ML; Wingo PA; Howe HL; Ward E; Ries LA; Schrag D; Jamison PM; Jemal A; Wu XC; Friedman C; Harlan L; Warren J; Anderson RN; Pickle LW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Oct; 97(19):1407-27. PubMed ID: 16204691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of North American Association of Central Cancer Registries' (NAACCR) data for use in population-based cancer survival studies.
    Weir HK; Johnson CJ; Mariotto AB; Turner D; Wilson RJ; Nishri D; Ward KC
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2014 Nov; 2014(49):198-209. PubMed ID: 25417233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in reporting delay in United States central cancer registries.
    Boscoe FP
    J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 25419607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An examination of the NAACCR method of assessing completeness of case ascertainment using the Canadian Cancer Registry.
    Zakaria D
    Health Rep; 2013 Aug; 24(8):3-13. PubMed ID: 24258322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coding completeness and quality of relative survival-related variables in the National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System, 1995-2008.
    Wilson RJ; O'Neil ME; Ntekop E; Zhang K; Ren Y
    J Registry Manag; 2014; 41(2):65-71; quiz 96-7. PubMed ID: 25153011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tissues from population-based cancer registries: a novel approach to increasing research potential.
    Goodman MT; Hernandez BY; Hewitt S; Lynch CF; Coté TR; Frierson HF; Moskaluk CA; Killeen JL; Cozen W; Key CR; Clegg L; Reichman M; Hankey BF; Edwards B
    Hum Pathol; 2005 Jul; 36(7):812-20. PubMed ID: 16084952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Study of completeness of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) program case ascertainment by hospital size and casefinding source.
    Zippin C; Lum D
    Health Rep; 1993; 5(1):87-90. PubMed ID: 8334243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining Fitness for Use of SEER Cause-Specific Cause of Death in Analyses of Cause-Specific Survival.
    Morawski BM; Hsieh MC; Wu M; Sherman R; Mariotto AB; Johnson CJ
    J Registry Manag; 2022; 49(4):177-189. PubMed ID: 37260823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Harnessing the Power of Cancer Registries to Advance Our Understanding of Pediatric Cancer.
    Hill SM; Michels FS; Knight K; Goderre JL; Terranova T; Hayes T; Kohler B
    J Registry Manag; 2023; 50(3):80-81. PubMed ID: 37941743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new method to evaluate the completeness of case ascertainment by a cancer registry.
    Das B; Clegg LX; Feuer EJ; Pickle LW
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Jun; 19(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 18270798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.
    Parkin DM; Bray F
    Eur J Cancer; 2009 Mar; 45(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 19128954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data quality at the Icelandic Cancer Registry: comparability, validity, timeliness and completeness.
    Sigurdardottir LG; Jonasson JG; Stefansdottir S; Jonsdottir A; Olafsdottir GH; Olafsdottir EJ; Tryggvadottir L
    Acta Oncol; 2012 Sep; 51(7):880-9. PubMed ID: 22974093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Completeness of hospital cancer case reporting from the SEER Program of the National Cancer Institute.
    Zippin C; Lum D; Hankey BF
    Cancer; 1995 Dec; 76(11):2343-50. PubMed ID: 8635041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility and Generalizability of Multistate, Population-Based Cancer Registry Data for Rural Cancer Surveillance Research in the United States.
    Zahnd WE; Jenkins WD; James AS; Izadi SR; Steward DE; Fogleman AJ; Colditz GA; Brard L
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Nov; 27(11):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 29563132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Completeness of ascertainment by cancer registries: putting bounds on the number of missing cases.
    Silcocks PB; Robinson D
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 15284320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A modification to the flow method to estimate completeness in cancer registries with delayed registration.
    Montanaro F; Robinson D; Bordoni A; Lutz JM
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Sep; 28(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 16849689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.