124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23493205)
1. Computed tomography-guided renal tumor biopsies: tumor imaging features affecting sample adequacy.
Davis IC; Heilbrun ME; Tangtiang K; Childs DD; Zagoria RJ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 23493205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy.
Leveridge MJ; Finelli A; Kachura JR; Evans A; Chung H; Shiff DA; Fernandes K; Jewett MA
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):578-84. PubMed ID: 21704449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed tomography-guided biopsy for small renal masses before or immediately after tumor ablation: factors affecting diagnostic yield.
Takafuji M; Fujimori M; Nakatsuka A; Kodama H; Yamanaka T; Sugino Y; Matsushita N; Kanda H; Hirokawa Y; Sakuma H
Jpn J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 39(3):283-292. PubMed ID: 33025338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsy of renal masses.
Schmidbauer J; Remzi M; Memarsadeghi M; Haitel A; Klingler HC; Katzenbeisser D; Wiener H; Marberger M
Eur Urol; 2008 May; 53(5):1003-11. PubMed ID: 18061339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image-guided biopsy of small renal masses in the era of ablative therapies.
Salem S; Ponsky LE; Abouassaly R; Cherullo EE; Isariyawongse JP; Maclennan GT; Nakamoto D; Haaga JR
Int J Urol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 23190309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of small solid renal lesions: can benign and malignant tumors be differentiated with CT?
Millet I; Doyon FC; Hoa D; Thuret R; Merigeaud S; Serre I; Taourel P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):887-96. PubMed ID: 21940576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical CT guidance.
Lechevallier E; André M; Barriol D; Daniel L; Eghazarian C; De Fromont M; Rossi D; Coulange C
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):506-10. PubMed ID: 10924578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of CT imaging features and tumor size with Fuhrman grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Oh S; Sung DJ; Yang KS; Sim KC; Han NY; Park BJ; Kim MJ; Cho SB
Acta Radiol; 2017 Mar; 58(3):376-384. PubMed ID: 27235451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chyluria after radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors.
Kaur H; Matin SF; Javadi S; Johnson VE; Choi H; Sandler C; Ahrar K
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Jul; 22(7):924-7. PubMed ID: 21507680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT-Guided Microwave Ablation of 45 Renal Tumors: Analysis of Procedure Complexity Utilizing a Percutaneous Renal Ablation Complexity Scoring System.
Mansilla AV; Bivins EE; Contreras F; Hernandez MA; Kohler N; Pepe JW
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):222-229. PubMed ID: 27988263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Small (<4 cm) clear cell renal cell carcinoma: correlation between CT findings and histologic grade.
Choi SY; Sung DJ; Yang KS; Kim KA; Yeom SK; Sim KC; Han NY; Park BJ; Kim MJ; Cho SB; Lee JH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jun; 41(6):1160-9. PubMed ID: 27040407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of computerized tomography guided percutaneous ablation of renal masses with nondiagnostic pre-ablation pathological findings.
Permpongkosol S; Link RE; Solomon SB; Kavoussi LR
J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):463-7; discussion 467. PubMed ID: 16813865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT.
Zhang J; Lefkowitz RA; Ishill NM; Wang L; Moskowitz CS; Russo P; Eisenberg H; Hricak H
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):494-504. PubMed ID: 17641370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinico-radio-pathologic features of a solitary solid renal mass at MDCT examination.
Kim EY; Park BK; Kim CK; Lee HM
Acta Radiol; 2010 Dec; 51(10):1143-8. PubMed ID: 20849320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Renal cell carcinoma: value of multiphase MDCT with multiplanar reformations in the detection of pseudocapsule.
Tsili AC; Argyropoulou MI; Gousia A; Kalef-Ezra J; Sofikitis N; Malamou-Mitsi V; Tsampoulas K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 22826400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Real-time 3D fluoroscopy-guided large core needle biopsy of renal masses: a critical early evaluation according to the IDEAL recommendations.
Kroeze SG; Huisman M; Verkooijen HM; van Diest PJ; Ruud Bosch JL; van den Bosch MA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Jun; 35(3):680-5. PubMed ID: 21822769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat on MDCT: can counts of negative-attenuation pixels aid diagnosis?
Simpfendorfer C; Herts BR; Motta-Ramirez GA; Lockwood DS; Zhou M; Leiber M; Remer EM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 19155407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous core biopsy for renal masses: indications, accuracy and results.
Lebret T; Poulain JE; Molinie V; Herve JM; Denoux Y; Guth A; Scherrer A; Botto H
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1184-8; discussion 1188. PubMed ID: 17698122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
